There is a newer version of the record available.

Published February 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

CNN-based event classification of alpha-decay events in nuclear emulsion

  • 1. Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578 (Japan)
  • 2. High Energy Nuclear Physics Laboratory, Cluster for Pioneering Research, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198 (Japan)
  • 3. Graduate School of Engineering, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193 (Japan)
  • 4. Faculty of Education, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193 (Japan)
  • 5. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, 222 South Tianshui Road, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, 730000 (China)
  • 6. GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Planckstrasse 1, D-64291 Darmstadt (Germany)
  • 7. Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence and Science, Rikkyo University, 3-34-1 Nishi Ikebukuro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo 171-8501 (Japan)

Description

Alpha-decay events in a nuclear emulsion are standard calibration sources for the relation between the track length and the kinetic energy in each emulsion sheet. We developed an efficient classifier that sorts such alpha-decay events from various vertex-like objects in an emulsion using a convolutional neural network (CNN). We trained the CNN using 15885 images of vertex-like objects, including 906 alpha-decay events, and tested it using a dataset of 46948 images including 255 alpha-decay events. The precision and recall scores of the classification using the previous method without a CNN for the same dataset were 0.081 ± 0.006 and 0.788 ± 0.056, respectively. In contrast, our trained models achieved an average precision score of 0.760 ± 0.006 for the test dataset, after extensively tuning the hyperparameters of the CNN. Moreover, for the model obtained, the discrimination threshold of the classification can be adjusted arbitrarily according to the trade-off between the precision and recall scores. Furthermore, the developed classifier obtained a precision of 0.571 ± 0.017 when the recall score was assigned a value of 0.788. Finally, the developed CNN method reduced the need for additional human visual inspection, required after classification, by a factor of approximately 1/7, compared to the former method without a CNN, proving the feasibility of the proposed classifier.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164930

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.nima.2020.164930;
PII
S0168900220313279;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research. Section A, Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
Journal Volume
989
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0168-9002
CODEN
NIMAER

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54011890
Subject category
S73: NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; S46: INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;
Descriptors DEI
ACCURACY; ALPHA DECAY; CALIBRATION STANDARDS; CLASSIFICATION; EMULSIONS; KINETIC ENERGY; KINETICS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NUCLEAR EMULSIONS; TUNING
Descriptors DEC
COLLOIDS; DECAY; DISPERSIONS; ENERGY; NUCLEAR DECAY; STANDARDS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.