CNN-based event classification of alpha-decay events in nuclear emulsion
Creators
- 1. Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578 (Japan)
- 2. High Energy Nuclear Physics Laboratory, Cluster for Pioneering Research, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198 (Japan)
- 3. Graduate School of Engineering, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193 (Japan)
- 4. Faculty of Education, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu 501-1193 (Japan)
- 5. School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, 222 South Tianshui Road, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, 730000 (China)
- 6. GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Planckstrasse 1, D-64291 Darmstadt (Germany)
- 7. Graduate School of Artificial Intelligence and Science, Rikkyo University, 3-34-1 Nishi Ikebukuro, Toshima-ku, Tokyo 171-8501 (Japan)
Description
Alpha-decay events in a nuclear emulsion are standard calibration sources for the relation between the track length and the kinetic energy in each emulsion sheet. We developed an efficient classifier that sorts such alpha-decay events from various vertex-like objects in an emulsion using a convolutional neural network (CNN). We trained the CNN using 15885 images of vertex-like objects, including 906 alpha-decay events, and tested it using a dataset of 46948 images including 255 alpha-decay events. The precision and recall scores of the classification using the previous method without a CNN for the same dataset were 0.081 ± 0.006 and 0.788 ± 0.056, respectively. In contrast, our trained models achieved an average precision score of 0.760 ± 0.006 for the test dataset, after extensively tuning the hyperparameters of the CNN. Moreover, for the model obtained, the discrimination threshold of the classification can be adjusted arbitrarily according to the trade-off between the precision and recall scores. Furthermore, the developed classifier obtained a precision of 0.571 ± 0.017 when the recall score was assigned a value of 0.788. Finally, the developed CNN method reduced the need for additional human visual inspection, required after classification, by a factor of approximately 1/7, compared to the former method without a CNN, proving the feasibility of the proposed classifier.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2020.164930Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.nima.2020.164930;
- PII
- S0168900220313279;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research. Section A, Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment
- Journal Volume
- 989
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0168-9002
- CODEN
- NIMAER
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54011890
- Subject category
- S73: NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; S46: INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; ALPHA DECAY; CALIBRATION STANDARDS; CLASSIFICATION; EMULSIONS; KINETIC ENERGY; KINETICS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NUCLEAR EMULSIONS; TUNING
- Descriptors DEC
- COLLOIDS; DECAY; DISPERSIONS; ENERGY; NUCLEAR DECAY; STANDARDS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.