Published June 2002 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparisons of point and average organ dose within an anthropomorphic physical phantom and a computational model of the newborn patient

  • 1. Department of Nuclear and Radiological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-8300 (United States)
  • 2. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-8300 (United States)
  • 3. Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-8300 (United States)

Description

Pediatric radiographic examinations yield medical benefits and/or diagnostic information that must be balanced against potential risk from patient radiation exposure. Consequently, clinical tools for measuring internal organ dose are needed for medical risk assessment. In this study, a physical phantom and Monte Carlo simulation model of the newborn patient were developed based upon their stylized mathematical expressions (ORNL and MIRD model series). The physical phantom was constructed using tissue equivalent substitutes for soft tissue, lung, and skeleton. Twenty metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters were then inserted at three-dimensional positions representing the centroids of organs assigned in the ICRP's definition of the effective dose. MOSFET-derived point estimates of organ dose were shown to be in reasonable agreement with Monte Carlo estimates for representative newborn head, chest, and abdomen radiographic exams. Ratios of average organ dose assessed via MCNP simulations to the MOSFET-derived point doses (point-to-organ dose scaling factors, SFPOD) are tabulated for subsequent use in clinical irradiations of the newborn phantom/MOSFET system. Values of SFPOD indicate that MOSFET measurements of point dose for in-field exposures need to be adjusted only to within 10% to report volume-averaged organ dose. Larger adjustments to point doses are noted for organs out-of-field. For walled organs, point estimates of organ dose at the content centroid are shown to underestimate the average wall dose when the organ is within the primary field: SFPOD of 1.19 for the stomach (AP chest exam), and SFPOD of 1.15 for the urinary bladder (AP abdomen exam)

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Medical Physics
Journal Volume
29
Journal Issue
6
Journal Page Range
p. 1080-1089
ISSN
0094-2405
CODEN
MPHYA6

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
35004254
Subject category
S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY; S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
DOSIMETRY; LUNGS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHANTOMS; RADIATION DOSES; SKELETON; X-RAY RADIOGRAPHY
Descriptors DEC
BODY; CALCULATION METHODS; DOSES; INDUSTRIAL RADIOGRAPHY; MATERIALS TESTING; MOCKUP; NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING; ORGANS; RESPIRATORY SYSTEM; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TESTING

Optional Information

Notes
(c) 2002 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.