Published September 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

High-resolution three-dimensional diffusion-weighted imaging of middle ear cholesteatoma at 3.0 T MRI: Usefulness of 3D turbo field-echo with diffusion-sensitized driven-equilibrium preparation (TFE–DSDE) compared to single-shot echo-planar imaging

  • 1. Department of Clinical Radiology, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582 (Japan)
  • 2. Philips Electronics Japan, 2-13-40, Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8501 (Japan)
  • 3. Departments of Molecular Imaging and Diagnosis, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582 (Japan)
  • 4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582 (Japan)

Description

Objective: To prospectively evaluate the usefulness of a newly developed high-resolution three-dimensional diffusion-weighted imaging method, turbo field-echo with diffusion-sensitized driven-equilibrium (TFE–DSDE) in diagnosing middle-ear cholesteatoma by comparing it to conventional single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (SS-EP DWI). Materials and methods: Institutional review board approval and informed consent from all participants were obtained. We studied 30 patients with preoperatively suspected acquired cholesteatoma. Each patient underwent an MR examination including both SS-EP DWI and DSDE-TFE using a 3.0 T MR scanner. Images of the 30 patients (60 temporal bones including 30 with and 30 without cholesteatoma) were reviewed by two independent neuroradiologists. The confidence level for the presence of cholesteatoma was graded on a scale of 0–2 (0 = definite absence, 1 = equivocal, 2 = definite presence). Interobserver agreement as well as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detection were assessed for the two reviewers. Results: Excellent interobserver agreement was shown for TFE–DSDE (κ = 0.821) whereas fair agreement was obtained for SS-EP DWI (κ = 0.416). TFE–DSDE was associated with significantly higher sensitivity (83.3%) and accuracy (90.0%) compared to SS-EP DWI (sensitivity = 35.0%, accuracy = 66.7%; p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in specificity (96.7% for TFE–DSDE, 98.3% for SS-EP DWI) Conclusion: With increased spatial resolution and reduced susceptibility artifacts, TFE–DSDE improves the accuracy in diagnosing acquired middle ear cholesteatomas compared to SS-EP DWI

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.018

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.018;
PII
S0720-048X(13)00214-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
82
Journal Issue
9
Journal Page Range
p. e471-e475
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.