Published July 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis

  • 1. Centre for Risk, Integrity and Safety Engineering (C-RISE), Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL A1B 3X5 (Canada)
  • 2. School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW (Australia)

Description

Highlights: • It identifies the gaps and challenges of Human Reliability (HR) in Chemical Process Industries (CPIs). • It analyzes literature collected from different sources published during 1975 to 2020. • It presents analysis related to maintenance, emergency, and control room operations. • It compares HR in CPI with nuclear power plants to identify the research opportunities. Chemical process industries (CPIs) work with a variety of hazardous materials in quantities which have the potential to have large health, environmental and financial impacts and as such are exposed to the risk of major accidents. The experience with accidents in this domain shows many cases which involve complex human-machine interactions. Human Reliability Analysis (HRA) has been utilized as a proactive approach to identify, model, and quantify human error highlighted as the leading cause of accidents. Consequently, researchers have actively worked on enhancing process safety and risk engineering since the '70s. However, despite its importance and practical implications for improving human reliability, there has not been a review of human reliability related to processing systems. The present study is aimed at presenting a systematic attempt to identify the needs, gaps, and challenges of HRA in CPI. An in-depth analysis of the literature in Web of Science core collection and Scopus databases from 1975 to August 2020 is conducted. This analysis focuses on human factors in three critical elements of CPIs: maintenance operations, emergency operations, and control room operations. The analysis synthesizes the theoretical and empirical findings, shedding light on the strengths and shortcomings of current literature and identifying research opportunities. A comparison of HRA in CPIs is undertaken with nuclear power plants (NPPs) to better understand the current stage of research and research challenges and opportunities.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107607

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2021.107607;
PII
S0951832021001526;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Journal Volume
211
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0951-8320
CODEN
RESSEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54018322
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING; S46: INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY;
Descriptors DEI
ACCIDENT MANAGEMENT; CONTROL ROOMS; HAZARDS; HUMAN FACTORS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; REACTOR OPERATION; REACTOR SAFETY
Descriptors DEC
MANAGEMENT; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; OPERATION; POWER PLANTS; REACTOR LIFE CYCLE; SAFETY; THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.