Published September 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Agricultural small anaerobic digestion plants: Combining economic and environmental assessment

  • 1. Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, Milan, 20133 (Italy)
  • 2. Department of Agraria, Università Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Località Feo di Vito, Reggio Calabria, 89122 (Italy)

Description

Highlights: • Small anaerobic digestion plants were studied on economic and environmental issues. • Environmental credits for avoided emissions from slurry storage were considered. • Specific subsidy for the reduction of Climate Change was quantified. • Environmental and economic performances resulted better for plant digesting slurries. • Reduction of Climate Change is achievable with low subsidy if small plants are used. -- Abstract: In the most recent decade, anaerobic digestion (AD) has been widely studied as an interesting and profitable solution to produce renewable energy. Focusing on AD plants fed with agricultural feedstock, the most investigated ones were big plants fed with cereal silages. However, the spreading of these plants has reduced after the variation of the subsidy framework, and it has been counterbalanced by the increase of small plants (<300 kW electrical power) fed almost only with animal slurries. Therefore, in this study were analysed two small AD plants in order to evaluate their environmental and economic performances. Life Cycle Assessment is adopted to assess the environmental side, while Net Present Value, payback period and Internal Rate of Return are adopted for the economic evaluation. Of the two small plants, the one totally fed with slurries showed both the best results on all the studied environmental impact categories, and the most interesting economic results, while the plant digesting pig slurry and maize silage was less beneficial. Moreover, the cost for reducing Greenhouse Gases (GHG) emissions (expressed as tons CO2 eq) was quantified for the two small plants in comparison with two other plants of 999 kW, resulting that small plants fed with slurries allow reducing GHG with lower subsidies respect to big plants that co-digest energy crops, even if these last plants produce more electricity.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105302;
PII
S096195341930251X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Biomass and Bioenergy
Journal Volume
128
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0961-9534
CODEN
BMSBEO

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.