Published December 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis

  • 1. Université de Montréal, Department of Radiology, Radio-Oncology and Nuclear Medicine (Canada)
  • 2. Université de Montréal, Department of Medicine, Division of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation (Canada)
  • 3. McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Canada)
  • 4. Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) (Canada)
  • 5. McGill University, Department of Pathology (Canada)
  • 6. Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Service of Pathology (Canada)

Description

Objectives

To perform head-to-head comparisons of the feasibility and diagnostic performance of transient elastography (TE), point shear-wave elastography (pSWE), and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE).

Methods

This prospective, cross-sectional, dual-center imaging study included 100 patients with known or suspected chronic liver disease caused by hepatitis B or C virus, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, or autoimmune hepatitis identified between 2014 and 2018. Liver stiffness measured with the three elastographic techniques was obtained within 6 weeks of a liver biopsy. Confounding effects of inflammation and steatosis on association between fibrosis and liver stiffness were assessed. Obuchowski scores and AUCs for staging fibrosis were evaluated and the latter were compared using the DeLong method.

Results

TE, pSWE, and MRE were technically feasible and reliable in 92%, 79%, and 91% subjects, respectively. At univariate analysis, liver stiffness measured by all techniques increased with fibrosis stages and inflammation and decreased with steatosis. For classification of dichotomized fibrosis stages, the AUCs were significantly higher for distinguishing stages F0 vs. ≥ F1 with MRE than with TE (0.88 vs. 0.71; p < 0.05) or pSWE (0.88 vs. 0.73; p < 0.05), and for distinguishing stages ≤ F1 vs. ≥ F2 with MRE than with TE (0.85 vs. 0.75; p < 0.05). TE, pSWE, and MRE Obuchowski scores for staging fibrosis stages were respectively 0.89 (95% CI 0.85–0.93), 0.90 (95% CI 0.85–0.94), and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.96).

Conclusion

MRE provided a higher diagnostic performance than TE and pSWE for staging early stages of liver fibrosis. Trial registration:

NCT02044523

Key Points

• The technical failure rate was similar between MRE and US-based elastography techniques.

• Liver stiffness measured by MRE and US-based elastography techniques increased with fibrosis stages and inflammation and decreased with steatosis.

• MRE provided a diagnostic accuracy higher than US-based elastography techniques for staging of early stages of histology-determined liver fibrosis.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology
Journal Volume
29
Journal Issue
12
Journal Page Range
p. 6477-6488
ISSN
0938-7994
CODEN
EURAE3

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 European Society of Radiology