Transport Limits for Non-Fixed Contamination: A Hazard to Optimization in Radioprotection

Current contamination limits for packages and conveyances under routine transport conditions have been derived from the Fairbairn model more than 40 years ago. This model has proved to be effective if used with pragmatism, but conservative. In some countries the limits are handled as action levels. Actions are taken if contamination levels are exceeded, but instant reporting to authorities is only necessary if the excess is higher than a certain factor of e.g. 10. In countries like Germany the limits are regarded as strictly binding. As could be seen after contamination incidents with transport casks for spent fuel assembly, the reporting by the media and perception by the public was not in accordance with the real radiation risk, which could in any case be neglected. However, exceeding the limits by only one percent lead in some cases immediately to legal actions. To avoid such actions, any practice with relevance for possible contamination or decontamination must consider an additional safety margin which is usually a factor of 10. This results -by the definition of TS-R1 recommendations- in a complete removal of non fixed contamination. For two examples the tremendous amount of decontamination work as well as measurements, which are necessary to reach this aim, is quantified. The first example focuses on the clearance measurements of 20' standard ISO-containers, (which are used exclusively for the transport of radioactive materials,) as conveyances for shipment of radioactive packages. In the second example (a loaded cask awaiting shipment) such actions lead to a real operational exposure which -according to good health physics practice- should otherwise be subject to minimization. These information is compared with the results of an IAEA working group, which was set up in 2000 with the aim of remodeling the exposure conditions for all persons involved in the transport of radioactive material, even members of the public. This international group combined members from regulatory bodies, expert groups, research and industry. Considering a nuclide specific approach and even reduced dose constraints, as a result higher contamination values could be acceptable for nearly all radionuclides. Although the new exposure model and the calculation of derived personal exposure have been formulated in consensus of the working group, it is still unclear, if and how these results will influence the IAEA revision process and the regulatory practice in the individual countries. A proposal is given, how the results of the new modeling can be implemented in the IAEA TS-R-1. Many working hours of nuclear personnel could be devoted to topics with a significantly higher benefit for radioprotection. (Author)