Published September 25, 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Numerical and experimental analyses of different magnetic thermodynamic cycles with an active magnetic regenerator

Description

We have analyzed the influence of different magnetic thermodynamic cycles on the performance of a magnetic cooling device with an active magnetic regenerator (AMR) based on the Brayton, Ericsson and Hybrid Brayton–Ericsson cycles. Initially, a numerical simulation was performed using a 1D, time-dependent, numerical model. Then a comparison was made with respect to the cooling power and the COP for different temperature spans. We showed that applying the Ericsson or the Hybrid Brayton–Ericsson cycle with an AMR, instead of the standard Brayton cycle, can increase the efficiency of the selected cooling device. Yet, in the case of the Ericsson cycle, the cooling power was decreased compared to the Hybrid and especially compared to the Brayton cycle. Next, an experimental analysis was carried out using a linear-type magnetic cooling device. Again, the Brayton, Ericsson and Hybrid Brayton–Ericsson cycles with an AMR were compared with respect to the cooling power and the COP for different temperature spans. The results of the numerical simulation were confirmed. The Hybrid Brayton–Ericsson cycle with an AMR showed the best performance if a no-load temperature span was considered as a criterion. -- Highlights: • New thermodynamic cycles with an active magnetic regenerator (AMR) are presented. • Three different thermodynamic cycles with an AMR were analyzed. • Numerical and experimental analyses were carried out. • The best overall performance was achieved with the Hybrid Brayton–Ericsson cycle. • With this cycle the temperature span of test device was increased by almost 10%

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.05.019

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.05.019;
PII
S1359-4311(13)00380-3;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Thermal Engineering
Journal Volume
59
Journal Issue
1-2
Journal Page Range
p. 52-59
ISSN
1359-4311
CODEN
ATENFT

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
45052583
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
ADIABATIC DEMAGNETIZATION; BRAYTON CYCLE; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT; ERICSSON CYCLE; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; REFRIGERATION; TIME DEPENDENCE
Descriptors DEC
COOLING; DEMAGNETIZATION; EVALUATION; MATHEMATICS; SIMULATION; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.