Published February 2014 | Version v1
Journal article

Triple-phase dynamic MRI: A new clue to predict malignant transformation of giant cell tumor of bone

  • 1. Department of Radiology, Yueyang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.110, Ganhe Road, Shanghai 200437 (China)
  • 2. Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.197, Ruijin 2nd Road, Shanghai 200025 (China)

Description

Objective: Our purpose was, through the comparison of the characteristics of time–intensity curve on triple-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI among groups of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), recurrent benign giant cell tumor of bone (RBGCTB), and secondary malignant giant cell tumor of bone (SMGCTB), to find clues to predict the malignant transformation of GCTB. Subjects and methods: 21 patients diagnosed as GCTB were included in this study. All cases took recurrence after intralesional curettage. 9 cases were confirmed as SMGCTB and 12 cases were confirmed as RBGCTB. Cases were divided into four groups: group A, GCTB (n = 9); group B, SMGCTB (n = 9); group C, GCTB (n = 12); group D, RBGCTB (n = 12). Enhancement index(EI) of lesions on DCEMRI was calculated using formula: EI(t) = [S(t) − S(0)]/S(0), where S(0) was signal intensity of lesion on non-contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images and S(t) was signal intensity of lesion on DCEMRI (t = 30, 60, 180 s). Enhancement index of each group in each phase was compared using One-Way ANOVA analysis. Slope values of time–intensity curve were compared by the same way. Results: Time–intensity curve of SMGCTB was characterized by a steep upward slope followed by an early and rapid washout phase. Time–intensity curve of GCTB and RBGCTB was characterized by a steep slope followed by a relatively slow washout phase. No significant difference in enhancement index was found in the first phase (p > 0.05). There was significant difference in the second and the third phase (p < 0.05). Enhancement index of group B (SMGCTB) was smaller. There was no difference in rising slope value (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI appears a helpful method to find new clues to predict malignant transformation of GCTB

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.013

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.013;
PII
S0720-048X(13)00544-5;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Journal of Radiology
Journal Volume
83
Journal Issue
2
Journal Page Range
p. 354-359
ISSN
0720-048X
CODEN
EJRADR

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
47005254
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; NEOPLASMS; NMR IMAGING; SKELETON; TRANSFORMATIONS; TUMOR CELLS
Descriptors DEC
ANIMAL CELLS; BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; EVALUATION; ORGANS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.