Published December 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Weighted-feature and cost-sensitive regression model for component continuous degradation assessment

  • 1. Chair on System Science and the Energetic Challenge, EDF Foundation, Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, Grande voie des Vignes, 92290 Chatenay-Malabry (France)
  • 2. Energy Department, Politecnico di Milano, Milano (Italy)

Description

Conventional data-driven models for component degradation assessment try to minimize the average estimation accuracy on the entire available dataset. However, an imbalance may exist among different degradation states, because of the specific data size and/or the interest of the practitioners on the different degradation states. Specifically, reliable equipment may experience long periods in low-level degradation states and small times in high-level ones. Then, the conventional trained models may result in overfitting the low-level degradation states, as their data sizes overwhelm the high-level degradation states. In practice, it is usually more interesting to have accurate results on the high-level degradation states, as they are closer to the equipment failure. Thus, during the training of a data-driven model, larger error costs should be assigned to data points with high-level degradation states when the training objective minimizes the total costs on the training dataset. In this paper, an efficient method is proposed for calculating the costs for continuous degradation data. Considering the different influence of the features on the output, a weighted-feature strategy is integrated for the development of the data-driven model. Real data of leakage of a reactor coolant pump is used to illustrate the application and effectiveness of the proposed approach. - Highlights: • A data-driven framework is proposed for assessment of continuous degradation. • The proposed framework tackles imbalance problem during degradation assessment. • The proposed framework integrates cost-sensitive and weighted-feature strategies. • The proposed framework is verified on several public imbalance datasets. • The proposed framework works well for a real case study from nuclear power plant.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.012

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.012;
PII
S0951-8320(16)30832-8;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Reliability Engineering and System Safety
Journal Volume
168
Journal Page Range
p. 210-217
ISSN
0951-8320
CODEN
RESSEP

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49091350
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
DATASETS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; TRAINING
Descriptors DEC
DOCUMENT TYPES; EDUCATION; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.