Published October 2014 | Version v1
Miscellaneous

How to Cope with the Rare Human Error Events Involved with organizational Factors in Nuclear Power Plants

  • 1. Korea Atomic Research Institute, Daejeon (Korea, Republic of)

Description

The current human error guidelines (e.g. US DOD handbooks, US NRC Guidelines) are representative tools to prevent human errors. These tools, however, have limits that they do not adapt all operating situations and circumstances such as design base events. In other words, these tools are only adapted foreseeable standardized operating situations and circumstances. In this study, our research team proposed an evidence-based approach such as UK's safety case to coping with the rare human error events such as TMI, Chernobyl, Fukushima accidents. These accidents are representative events involved with rare human errors. Our research team defined the 'rare human errors' as the follow three characterized events; Extremely low frequency Extremely high complicated structure Extremely serious damage of human life and property A safety case is a structured argument, supported by evidence, intended to justify that a system is acceptably safe. The definition by UK defense standard 00-56 issue 4 states that such an evidence-based approach can be contrast with a prescriptive approach to safety certification, which require safety to be justified using a prescribed process. Safety managements and safety regulatory activities based on safety case are effective to control organizational factors in terms of integrated safety management. Especially safety issues relevant with public acceptance are useful to provide practical evidences to the public reasonably. European Union including UK has developed the concept of engineered safety management system to deal with public acceptance using the safety case. In Korea nuclear industry, the Korean Atomic Research Institute has firstly performed a basic research to adapt the safety case in the field of radioactive waste according to the IAEA SSG-23(KAERI/TR-4497, 4531). Excepting the radioactive waste, there is no try to adapt the safety case yet. Most incidents and accidents involved human during operating NPPs have a tendency to be structured by complicated and various organizational, individual, and environmental factors. The rare human errors being induced by complicated interactions are easy to be exclusive in the band of the safety management generally because the rare human errors occur infrequently. In this study, the rare human error event was named as 'Unsafety Case'. Through this challenging try based on evidences to the human errors could be useful to prevent rare and critical events can occur in the future. The proposed approach, however, will be depend on the operating companies, which companies should develop more various unsafety cases and prepare the unsafety case reports according to the structured writer's guidance. The unsafety cases involved rare human errors are based on evidences which are consist of theory, revealed real case, and expert judgment

Part of:
Proceedings of the KNS 2014 Fall Meeting

Additional details

Publishing Information

Publisher
KNS
Imprint Place
Daejeon (Korea, Republic of)
Imprint Title
Proceedings of the KNS 2014 Fall Meeting
Imprint Pagination
[1 CD-ROM]
Journal Page Range
[2 p.]

Conference

Title
2014 Fall Meeting of the KNS
Dates
29-31 Oct 2014
Place
Pyongchang (Korea, Republic of)

INIS

Country of Publication
Korea, Republic of
Country of Input or Organization
Korea, Republic of
INIS RN
46060912
Subject category
S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference, Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
ERRORS; HUMAN FACTORS; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; RADIOACTIVE WASTES; REACTOR OPERATION; SAFETY
Descriptors DEC
INDUSTRY; MATERIALS; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; OPERATION; POWER PLANTS; RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; WASTES

Optional Information

Notes
4 refs, 1 fig