Radiation dose reduction in soft tissue neck CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR)
- 1. Neuroradiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 (United States)
- 2. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215 (United States)
Description
Purpose: To compare objective and subjective image quality in neck CT images acquired at different tube current–time products (275 mA s and 340 mA s) and reconstructed with filtered-back-projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR). Materials and methods: HIPAA-compliant study with IRB approval and waiver of informed consent. 66 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to undergo contrast-enhanced neck CT at a standard tube-current–time-product (340 mA s; n = 33) or reduced tube-current–time-product (275 mA s, n = 33). Data sets were reconstructed with FBP and 2 levels (30%, 40%) of ASIR-FBP blending at 340 mA s and 275 mA s. Two neuroradiologists assessed subjective image quality in a blinded and randomized manner. Volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length-product (DLP), effective dose, and objective image noise were recorded. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was computed as mean attenuation in a region of interest in the sternocleidomastoid muscle divided by image noise. Results: Compared with FBP, ASIR resulted in a reduction of image noise at both 340 mA s and 275 mA s. Reduction of tube current from 340 mA s to 275 mA s resulted in an increase in mean objective image noise (p = 0.02) and a decrease in SNR (p = 0.03) when images were reconstructed with FBP. However, when the 275 mA s images were reconstructed using ASIR, the mean objective image noise and SNR were similar to those of the standard 340 mA s CT images reconstructed with FBP (p > 0.05). Subjective image noise was ranked by both raters as either average or less-than-average irrespective of the tube current and iterative reconstruction technique. Conclusion: Adapting ASIR into neck CT protocols reduced effective dose by 17% without compromising image quality
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.014Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.014;
- PII
- S0720-048X(13)00413-0;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Journal of Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 82
- Journal Issue
- 12
- Journal Page Range
- p. 2222-2226
- ISSN
- 0720-048X
- CODEN
- EJRADR
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- Cuba
- INIS RN
- 46084628
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ANIMAL TISSUES; CAT SCANNING; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; IMAGES; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATERIALS; MUSCLES; NECK; NOISE; PATIENTS; RADIATION DOSES; RANDOMNESS; REDUCTION; STANDARDS
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; CALCULATION METHODS; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DOSES; EVALUATION; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.