Design of structure and optimization of organic Rankine cycle for heat recovery from gas turbine: The use of 4E, advanced exergy and advanced exergoeconomic analysis
- 1. Department of Energy System Engineering, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
- 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Petroleum University of Technology, Abadan (Iran, Islamic Republic of)
Description
Highlights: • Optimum architecture of ORC cycles for the recovery of gas turbine exhaust selected. • Working fluid selected in terms of environment, thermodynamics and performance range. • 4E analysis of ORC and its optimization by genetic algorithm has been done. • All components of the cycle at optimum state examined from advanced exergy and advanced exergoeconomic perspectives. -- Abstract: This paper presents the evaluation and optimization of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) approached from four different perspectives: (1) selecting the ORC Cycle; (2) selecting the working fluid in accordance with the thermodynamic properties and environmental impacts; (3) analyzing energy and exergoeconomic; and finally, (4) advanced exergy and advanced exergoeconomic. The working fluid is selected based on the thermal source temperature and the environmental impacts including the reduction of ozone depletion (ODP) and global warming potential (GWP). Then, the selected working fluids in different cycles are investigated in terms of the thermodynamic properties based on energy and exergy concepts. The parameters of the selected cycles (from the perspective of energy and exergy), including the temperature and pressure of the input working fluid of the turbine, the pinch and approach temperature, and so on, are optimized by a genetic algorithm. Two objective functions of price and exergy efficiency are selected as the objective functions for optimal cycles. The results of this study reveal that single-pressure and dual-pressure cycles with recuperator and the R123 working fluid have the highest power and the lowest cost. It is indicated that the net power generation of dual pressure cycle with recuperator, single pressure with recuperator, and dual pressure cycle with two working fluids are 2.2 kW, (R123: 2.31 kW, R600: 1.72 kW) and 2.26 kW, respectively. Also, the cost of generated electricity for dual pressure cycle with recuperator, single pressure cycle with recuperator, and dual pressure cycle with two working fluids are 14.59, (R123: 13.03, R600: 21.95) and 16.78 (Cent/kWh), respectively. In addition, the results show that the cycles of dual pressure with recuperator and single pressure with recuperator with R123 as a working fluid have the highest exergy efficiency. The advanced exergy analysis indicated that the HRSG and turbine components are important to be improved based on exergetic performance.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.09.128Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.09.128;
- PII
- S1359431118309165;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Applied Thermal Engineering
- Journal Volume
- 147
- Journal Page Range
- p. 272-290
- ISSN
- 1359-4311
- CODEN
- ATENFT
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54125350
- Subject category
- S42: ENGINEERING;
- Descriptors DEI
- EXERGY; GAS TURBINES; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HEAT RECOVERY; OPTIMIZATION; RANKINE CYCLE; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS; WORKING FLUIDS
- Descriptors DEC
- ALGORITHMS; ENERGY; ENERGY RECOVERY; EQUIPMENT; FLUIDS; MACHINERY; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES; TURBINES; TURBOMACHINERY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.