Published March 2016 | Version v1
Journal article

Do driving restriction policies effectively motivate commuters to use public transportation?

  • 1. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin (China)
  • 2. Research Institute of Architectural Design & Urban Planning, Tianjin University, 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin (China)

Description

Driving restriction policies have been implemented in some large Chinese cities to cope with severe urban smog pollution. We explored the roles of policy acceptance and other factors in commuters' transport mode decisions, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. A questionnaire survey was conducted in Tianjin, China. A structural equation model was developed to test eight hypotheses, two of which were rejected. The results indicate that a driving restriction policy alone cannot effectively motivate commuters to use public transport if the policymakers fail to improve public transport, enhance commuters' awareness of consequences, increase commuters' perceived behavior control, and encourage car owners to change driving behavior. Comparisons between car owners and non-owners indicated that car owners view driving restriction policy and public transport more negatively. These negative views could be a barrier for the promotion of public transport among car owners. In addition, attitude toward public transport was found to have positive correlation with commuting time. - Highlights: • Attitude towards public transport has an impact on policy acceptance. • Driving habit indirectly affects policy acceptance and perceived behavior control. • Driving restriction policy and public transport are not popular among car owners. • Attitude towards public transport correlates positively with commuting time.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.038

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.038;
PII
S0301-4215(15)30252-4;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
90
Journal Page Range
p. 253-261
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
48008115
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
AUTOMOBILES; CHINA; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CONTROL; CORRELATIONS; POLLUTION; PUBLIC ENTERPRISES; PUBLIC OPINION; SMOG; TRANSPORT; URBAN AREAS
Descriptors DEC
ASIA; EVALUATION; VEHICLES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.