Published November 2010
| Version v1
Journal article
A decision model for energy resource selection in China
- 1. Network Education School, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100088 (China)
- 2. Portland State University, Department of Engineering and Technology Management, Portland, OR 97207-0751 (United States)
Description
This paper evaluates coal, petroleum, natural gas, nuclear energy and renewable energy resources as energy alternatives for China through use of a hierarchical decision model. The results indicate that although coal is still the major preferred energy alternative, it is followed closely by renewable energy. The sensitivity analysis indicates that the most critical criterion for energy selection is the current energy infrastructure. A hierarchical decision model is used, and expert judgments are quantified, to evaluate the alternatives. Criteria used for the evaluations are availability, current energy infrastructure, price, safety, environmental impacts and social impacts.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.031Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.031;
- PII
- S0301-4215(10)00561-6;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 38
- Journal Issue
- 11
- Journal Page Range
- p. 7130-7141
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 42005035
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- CHINA; COAL; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; NATURAL GAS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; PETROLEUM; PRICES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOCIAL IMPACT
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; ENERGY; ENERGY SOURCES; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; MATERIALS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.