Published November 2010 | Version v1
Journal article

A decision model for energy resource selection in China

  • 1. Network Education School, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100088 (China)
  • 2. Portland State University, Department of Engineering and Technology Management, Portland, OR 97207-0751 (United States)

Description

This paper evaluates coal, petroleum, natural gas, nuclear energy and renewable energy resources as energy alternatives for China through use of a hierarchical decision model. The results indicate that although coal is still the major preferred energy alternative, it is followed closely by renewable energy. The sensitivity analysis indicates that the most critical criterion for energy selection is the current energy infrastructure. A hierarchical decision model is used, and expert judgments are quantified, to evaluate the alternatives. Criteria used for the evaluations are availability, current energy infrastructure, price, safety, environmental impacts and social impacts.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.031

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.031;
PII
S0301-4215(10)00561-6;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
38
Journal Issue
11
Journal Page Range
p. 7130-7141
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
42005035
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
CHINA; COAL; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; NATURAL GAS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; PETROLEUM; PRICES; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOCIAL IMPACT
Descriptors DEC
ASIA; CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; ENERGY; ENERGY SOURCES; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; MATERIALS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.