Published October 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves

  • 1. Institute of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Szent István University, Páter Károly utca 1, Gödöllő H-2100 (Hungary)
  • 2. MTA–SZIE Large Animal Clinical Research Group, Üllő-Dóra major H-2225 (Hungary)
  • 3. Department of Methodology, Hungarian Central Statistical Office, Keleti Károly utca 5-7, Budapest H-1024 (Hungary)
  • 4. Department of Animal Hygiene, Herd Health and Veterinary Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine, István utca 2, Budapest H-1078 (Hungary)

Description

Warm summer episodes have a significant effect on the overall health and well-being of young cattle; however, it is not known which temperature measure should be used for estimating heat stress in dairy calves. In this study, generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the relationships between thermal comfort indices and animal-based heat stress indicators in sixteen Holstein bull calves that were housed in individual calf hutches. Data were collected under continental weather characteristics over a 5-day period: day 1 (lower-temperature day), days 2 and 3 (heat stress days), and a 2-day post-stress period. Relative humidity, ambient temperature, the heat index, the humidex and five different temperature–humidity indices (THI) were used as thermal indices. Physiological variables monitored included respiratory rate, rectal temperature, ear skin temperature and heart rate. The heat index and the humidex measuring human thermal comfort were more closely associated with physiological measures than were the ambient temperature or the THIs (in case of heat index: R2 = 0.87 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.63 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.70 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.78 for heart rate, respectively; in case of humidex: R2 = 0.85 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.60 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.68 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.75 for heart rate, respectively). Based on our results, parameters of human outdoor comfort seem better to estimate heat stress in dairy calves in a continental region than those of THIs or ambient temperature.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036;
PII
S0013935118302883;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Environmental Research
Journal Volume
166
Journal Page Range
p. 108-111
ISSN
0013-9351
CODEN
ENVRAL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc.