Published September 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Designing local renewable energy communities to increase social acceptance: Evidence from a choice experiment in Austria, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland

  • 1. Energy Institute at the Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Straße 69, 4040, Linz (Austria)

Description

Highlight• Renewable energy communities (RECs) are emphasized by the EC's 2018 RES Directive. • The social impacts of technological options for configuring RECs are assessed. • A survey in AT, DE, IT and CH collects related preferences of 2,000 residents. • Acceptance of RECs can be improved with support from politicians in IT and CH. • Monthly willingness to pay for RECs to include solar generation is €30. Resistance of the local population to new energy infrastructure may hinder achieving the European Union's goal that 32% of energy consumption come from renewable sources. A vast literature is available on the social acceptance of specific renewable energy technologies, but existing research lacks assessments regarding comprehensive transformations to local energy systems. Moreover, the promising energy storage technology power-to-gas has not yet been addressed in acceptance studies. This paper fills these gaps by analysing data from a choice experiment survey with 2000 respondents across four nations (Germany, Austria, Italy, and Switzerland). Results from the analysis show that solar farms and power-to-gas infrastructure increase acceptance of local energy communities, while wind farms have an ambiguous effect, and gas power plants and power lines decrease acceptance. The derived monthly willingness to pay estimates for the acceptance-increasing technologies ranges from 8.5€ for power-to-gas to 29.5€ for photovoltaics. Additionally, we investigate whether stated support from political opinion leaders at the local, national, and EU levels can increase the acceptance of renewable energy systems. Results suggest that Italian choices are influenced by the opinions of EU and national governmental bodies (+3.5% and +2.7%), and that Swiss choices are sensitive to the opinions of local politicians (+2.3%).

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.06.067;
PII
S0301421519304379;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
132
Journal Page Range
p. 1176-1183
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55007622
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
DESIGN; ENERGY STORAGE; ENERGY SYSTEMS; PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECT; POWER PLANTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SOCIAL IMPACT; SOLAR CELLS; WIND TURBINE ARRAYS
Descriptors DEC
DIRECT ENERGY CONVERTERS; ENERGY SOURCES; EQUIPMENT; PHOTOELECTRIC CELLS; PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT; PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS; SOLAR EQUIPMENT; STORAGE

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.