Published September 15, 2009
| Version v1
Journal article
The bootstrap and Bayesian bootstrap method in assessing bioequivalence
Creators
- 1. Department of Mathematics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074 (China)
- 2. College of Statistics and Mathematics of Anhui Finance and Economics University, Bengbu 233030 (China)
- 3. Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030 (China)
Description
Parametric method for assessing individual bioequivalence (IBE) may concentrate on the hypothesis that the PK responses are normal. Nonparametric method for evaluating IBE would be bootstrap method. In 2001, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed a draft guidance. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the IBE between test drug and reference drug by bootstrap and Bayesian bootstrap method. We study the power of bootstrap test procedures and the parametric test procedures in FDA (2001). We find that the Bayesian bootstrap method is the most excellent.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2008.08.035Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.chaos.2008.08.035;
- PII
- S0960-0779(08)00406-2;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
- Journal Volume
- 41
- Journal Issue
- 5
- Journal Page Range
- p. 2246-2249
- ISSN
- 0960-0779
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 41020285
- Subject category
- S97: MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND COMPUTING;
- Descriptors DEI
- CALCULATION METHODS; DRUGS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; US FDA; USA
- Descriptors DEC
- DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; NORTH AMERICA; US HEW; US ORGANIZATIONS
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.