Published September 15, 2009 | Version v1
Journal article

The bootstrap and Bayesian bootstrap method in assessing bioequivalence

  • 1. Department of Mathematics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074 (China)
  • 2. College of Statistics and Mathematics of Anhui Finance and Economics University, Bengbu 233030 (China)
  • 3. Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030 (China)

Description

Parametric method for assessing individual bioequivalence (IBE) may concentrate on the hypothesis that the PK responses are normal. Nonparametric method for evaluating IBE would be bootstrap method. In 2001, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed a draft guidance. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the IBE between test drug and reference drug by bootstrap and Bayesian bootstrap method. We study the power of bootstrap test procedures and the parametric test procedures in FDA (2001). We find that the Bayesian bootstrap method is the most excellent.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2008.08.035

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.chaos.2008.08.035;
PII
S0960-0779(08)00406-2;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
Journal Volume
41
Journal Issue
5
Journal Page Range
p. 2246-2249
ISSN
0960-0779

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
41020285
Subject category
S97: MATHEMATICAL METHODS AND COMPUTING;
Descriptors DEI
CALCULATION METHODS; DRUGS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; US FDA; USA
Descriptors DEC
DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; NORTH AMERICA; US HEW; US ORGANIZATIONS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.