EURADOS 241Am skull measurement intercomparison
Creators
- 1. Thünen Institute of Fisheries Ecology, Marckmannstraße 129b, 20539 Hamburg (Germany)
- 2. Helmholtz Zentrum München, National Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg (Germany)
- 3. CIEMAT, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, Avda Complutense 40, 28040 Madrid (Spain)
- 4. Czech Technical University in Prague, Brehova 7, 11519 Prague (Czech Republic)
- 5. BfS, Federal Office for Radiation Protection, Department of Radiation Protection and Health, 85764 Oberschleißheim (Germany)
- 6. NRPI, National Radiation Protection Institute, Prague (Czech Republic)
- 7. PHE, Public Health England, CRCE, Didcot OX11 0RQ (United Kingdom)
- 8. IRSN, Radiological Protection and Human Health Division, BP17, 92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex (France)
- 9. STUK, Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (Finland)
- 10. KIT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggentein-Leopoldshafen (Germany)
- 11. Mission Support Alliance, Richland, WA (United States)
- 12. SCK-CEN, Studiecentrum voor Kernenergie (Belgian Nuclear Research Centre), Mol (Belgium)
- 13. HML, Health Canada, Human Monitoring Laboratory/Radiation Protection Bureau, Ottawa, Ontario (Canada)
Description
In 2011 a measurement intercomparison was launched by EURADOS WG7, with the objective of providing the participants with the tools to calibrate their detection systems for detection of 241Am in the skull bone, and evaluate the variability due to the used of the different calibration phantoms. Three skull phantoms were used in this intercomparison: the USTUR Case 0102 skull phantom, the BfS skull phantom and the CSR skull phantom. Very good agreement was found between the results of the twelve participating laboratories, with relative deviations of less than 15% for the BfS phantom and less than 17% for the USTUR phantom when measurement efficiency in defined positions was compared. However, the phantoms' measured absolute 241Am activities showed discrepancies of up to a factor of 3.4. This is mainly due to the physical differences between the standard calibration phantoms used by the participants and those used in this intercomparison exercise. - Highlights: • The results revealed some of the difficulties associated with the phantoms use. • The results obtained show that it is necessary the fabrication of a new phantom. • The participants validated their measurements and calibrations. • This work contributed for the harmonization of skull measurements and calibration.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2015.07.011Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.radmeas.2015.07.011;
- PII
- S1350-4487(15)30054-8;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Radiation Measurements
- Journal Volume
- 82
- Journal Page Range
- p. 64-73
- ISSN
- 1350-4487
- CODEN
- RMEAEP
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48099769
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Descriptors DEI
- AMERICIUM 241; CALIBRATION STANDARDS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; DIAGRAMS; PHANTOMS; SKULL
- Descriptors DEC
- ACTINIDE NUCLEI; ALPHA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES; AMERICIUM ISOTOPES; BODY; EVALUATION; HEAVY NUCLEI; INFORMATION; ISOTOPES; MOCKUP; NUCLEI; ODD-EVEN NUCLEI; ORGANS; RADIOISOTOPES; SKELETON; SPONTANEOUS FISSION RADIOISOTOPES; STANDARDS; STRUCTURAL MODELS; YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.