Published 1988 | Version v1
Report

Comments by participants

  • 1. Kernforschungsanlage Juelich (Germany)

Description

Using the extremity dosemeter developed at the Juelich Nuclear Research Centre (KFA), it was possible to satisfactorily determine the directional dose equivalent. Irrespective of the type of radiation, the radiation energy or direction of incidence, the results agreed with the reference value within ±23% for all 36 irradiated dosemeters. Moreover, in many cases it was possible to specify the radiation quality. These results were obtained with a dosemeter whose thinnest detector had the relatively large mass per area of 30 mg/cm2

Part of:
Beta dosimetry. Fifth information seminar on the radiation protection dosemeter intercomparison programme

Additional details

Additional titles

Augmented title (English)
Scientific and technical aspects of the intercomparison programme of individual beta dosemeters used for radiation protection

Publishing Information

ISBN
92-825-8282-5
Imprint Title
Beta dosimetry. Fifth information seminar on the radiation protection dosemeter intercomparison programme
Imprint Pagination
313 p.
Journal Issue
no. 38
Series
Radiation protection series
Journal Page Range
p. 104-117
Report number
EUR--11363-EN

Conference

Title
5. information seminar on the radiation protection dosemeter intercomparison programme
Dates
25-27 May 1987
Place
Bologna (Italy)

INIS

Country of Publication
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
35052101
Subject category
S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference, Non-conventional Literature
Descriptors DEI
BETA DOSIMETRY; CALIBRATION STANDARDS; DOSE EQUIVALENTS; DOSEMETERS; EVALUATION; INCIDENCE ANGLE; INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS; PHANTOMS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIATION QUALITY; SKIN; SSDL
Descriptors DEC
BODY; DOSES; DOSIMETRY; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; MOCKUP; ORGANS; STANDARDS; STRUCTURAL MODELS

Optional Information

Notes
4 refs, 3 figs, 2 tabs