Published November 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Secondary aerosol formation from a Chinese gasoline vehicle: Impacts of fuel (E10, gasoline) and driving conditions (idling, cruising)

  • 1. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, International Joint Laboratory for Regional Pollution Control, Ministry of Education (IJRC), College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871 (China)
  • 2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044 (China)

Description

Highlights: • The effects of vehicle speed and E10 on SOA formation were investigated. • SOA production at idling conditions was higher than that at cruising conditions. • No statistical difference was found for SOA formation between gasoline andE10. • Particle effective densities grow with increased OH exposure. • Only 16%–38% of the measured SOA was explained by measured VOCs. Chassis dynamometer experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of vehicle speed and usage of ethanol-blended gasoline (E10) on formation and evolution of gasoline vehicular secondary organic aerosol (SOA) using a Gothenburg Potential Aerosol Mass (Go: PAM) reactor. The SOA forms rapidly, and its concentration exceeds that of primary organic aerosol (POA) at an equivalent photochemical age (EPA) of ~1 day. The particle effective densities grow from 0.62 ± 0.02 g cm−3 to 1.43 ± 0.07 g cm−3 with increased hydroxyl radical (OH) exposure. The maximum SOA production under idling conditions (4259–7394 mg kg-fuel−1) is ~20 times greater than under cruising conditions. There was no statistical difference between SOA formation from pure gasoline and its formation from E10. The slopes in Van Krevelen diagram indicate that the formation pathways of bulk SOA includes the addition of both alcohol/peroxide functional groups and carboxylic acid formation from fragmentation. A closure estimation of SOA based on bottom-up and top-down methods shows that only 16%–38% of the measured SOA can be explained by the oxidation of measured volatile organic compounds (VOCs), suggesting the existence of missing precursors, e.g. unmeasured VOCs and probably semivolatile or intermediate volatile organic compounds (S/IVOCs). Our results suggest that applying parameters obtained from unified driving cycles to model SOA concentrations may lead to large discrepancies between modeled and ambient vehicular SOA. No reduction in vehicular SOA production is realized by replacing normal gasoline with E10.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148809

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148809;
PII
S004896972103881X;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
795
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.