Performance evaluation of a system for PET tomography ellipsoidal geometry

Among the diagnostic imaging techniques in Nuclear Medicine, have been prominent in Positron Emission Tomography (PET). PET provides functional images of the region or organ of interest, allowing diagnostic of various diseases and also a mapping of the development or regression of the same. Current PET systems feature blocks arranged in circular geometry crystals, but the search for new arrangements, in different geometries, is relevant because it can provide a better performance of these scanners. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of a PET system consisting of blocks of crystals ellipsoidal arrangement. For this study, we used the GATE simulation environment for emission tomography that presented satisfactory results compared to the devices used in the clinical routine. This way we prepared two PET systems, the first one containing 46 blocks of crystals arranged in a circular geometry, where the opposite detectors were separated by a distance of 816.4 mm in the transaxial direction. In the second case, we used 36 blocks of crystals arranged in an elliptical geometry, where the detectors are separated a distance of 500 mm in the vertical direction and 816.4 mm in the horizontal direction. After the simulations were performed, the validation tests for sensitivity, scatter fraction, NEC (Noise Equivalent Count Rate) and Spatial Resolution were made, to finally evaluate and compare the performance of the PET system for both proposed geometries. The tests were made accordingly to specified NEMA NU 2-2007 standard. For the sensitivity test, with the phantom located in the center of FOV transaxial of the tomography, we obtained a gain in PET system with elliptical geometry of 28.7% compared to the conventional system, the circular geometry. For the phantom shifted to 10 cm from the center of the transaxial FOV, the sensitivity of PET elliptical system was 26.2% higher than in the circular. The acquisition time for each simulation in this test was 400 s. For Scatter Fraction test and NEC, were made 33 simulations for each geometry, varying the time of acquisition and activity. The scatter fraction in the elliptical geometry was 35,5% and 34,6% in the circular geometry. In the circular geometry, NEC curve reaches its peak in 259.3 kcps at an activity concentration of 34.1 kBq ml-1, for the elliptical geometry, the maximum peak is reached at 239.1 kcps at an activity concentration of 24.8 kBq ml-1. For the spatial resolution test we used a point source containing ¹⁸F with 4 MBq activity and acquisition time of 200 s. The measurements were acquired in three transaxial positions (x,y) in the center of FOV and, shifted in ¼ of the center of the FOV, summarizing 6 measurements for each geometry. For each one of these 6 measurements, we found the FWHM (Full width at half-maximum amplitude) and the FWTM (Full width at tenth-maximum amplitude) in the three axis (x,y,z), in this way, for each proposed geometry, we obtained 18 values of FWHM and 18 values of FWTM. The elliptical geometry showed improvement in the spatial resolution in FWHM in 4 of the 18 resolution values. For the FWTM, the elliptical geometry showed improvement in 8 of 18 resolution values. Regarding the FWHM, where there was an improvement in spatial resolution, we obtained the average gain of 18,7%. For the losses, in spatial resolution was an average of 43,26%. For the FWTM, the improvement in spatial resolution was an average percentage of 12,09%, while the loss of resolution had the average percentage of 45,59%. It can be concluded that the proposed geometry showed some advantages regarding the traditional geometry. In the elliptical geometry there is one reduction of 10 blocks of crystals in relation to the circular geometry, which possibly can cut fabrication costs of the tomography. Regarding to sensibility, there is a significant improvement for the new geometry, as well as one reduction of the activity concentration in which the tomography reaches the best performance, although the occurrence of a slight fall in the counts in the elliptical system. This reduction in the activity concentration can help to reduce the test time and the use less radioactive material, reducing the risk for the patients and the test costs, as well as improving the number of tests in the same period of time. The scattering fraction in the elliptical system is slight higher to the circular system. The major loss in the elliptical PET system is the spatial resolution, where there was not improvement for the great fraction of the obtained measurements, requiring some modifications that can be made, in special, in the crystal blocks arrangement. It is believed that some modifications to the angle of the detectors and in the formation of the coincidences can improve the resolutions and NEC. (author)