Published August 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Experimental stability maps for a two-phase natural circulation reactor with and without void-reactivity feedback effect

  • 1. School of Nuclear Engineering, Purdue University, 400 Central Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2017 (United States)
  • 2. Takasago Research and Development Center, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd., 2-1-Shinhama Arai-Cho, Takasago, Hyogo 676-8686 (Japan)

Description

Highlights: • A scaled experimental facility is designed based on the sound scaling approach. • Experiments are performed to identify the instability phenomena. • Four heater rods are used to simulate the chaotic flashing phenomena. • Experiments are performed with and without void-reactivity feedback. • Stability maps are obtained at different system pressures. -- Abstract: The new small-scaled light water reactor design, known as integral modular water reactor (IMR), is susceptible to flow instabilities due to two-phase natural circulation inside the reactor pressure vessel (RPV). Flow instabilities may be amplified due to strong interaction between the flow and the core power through the void-reactivity feedback mechanism. During the start-up of the IMR, system pressure is low. At low pressure, the density ratio is quite high, which leads to large variation in void fraction due to change in the flow quality. In the IMR design, the long riser and large volume of water can lead to thermal non-equilibrium between the phases due to the significant variation of the saturation temperature along flow direction. This can result in flow oscillations at certain operating conditions. In order to understand and identify the instability phenomena during the start-up of the reactor, a scaled experimental facility is designed based on the sound scaling approach. The scaling laws are used to obtain design parameters to maintain the similarities between the prototype and the experimental facility. Four heater rods are used to simulate the chaotic flashing phenomena. The steady state tests are performed with and without void-reactivity feedback at different system pressures. The flow is stable below a certain core power regardless of the channel inlet subcooling. The region of stability grows in size as the core power is increased. The unstable region reduces significantly at high pressure compared to low pressure case. A new approach is presented to simulate the void reactivity feedback in a scaled experimental facility. High subcooling boundary is not affected by the void-reactivity feedback. As the inlet subcooling is decreased, power starts oscillating with the certain frequency and it slightly increases the flow velocity oscillation amplitude. It is found out that the coolant power may oscillate in phase or out of phase with the void fraction depending on the fuel rod time constant, which may destabilize or stabilize the system

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.03.037

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.03.037;
PII
S0029-5493(13)00179-9;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Nuclear Engineering and Design
Journal Volume
261
Journal Page Range
p. 181-200
ISSN
0029-5493
CODEN
NEDEAU

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.