Published February 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Function of restored wetlands for waterbird conservation in the Yellow Sea coast

  • 1. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Coastal Ecosystems Research Station of the Yangtze River Estuary, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433 (China)
  • 2. Shanghai Chongming Dongtan National Nature Reserve, Shanghai 202183 (China)

Description

Highlights: • Restored wetlands support high waterbird diversity • Waterbird communities differ among restored, natural, and artificial wetlands • Restored wetlands are unlikely to replace the natural ones for waterbird conservation • Natural wetland conservation should be the priority for waterbird conservation To reduce the harm to wildlife caused by habitat loss and degradation, significant resources have been invested in habitat restoration worldwide. However, whether restored habitats can support wildlife communities similar to those natural ones remains unclear. Providing habitat for waterbirds, which are dependent on wetland for their survival, is a major target in many wetland restoration practices. Here we conducted a year-round waterbird survey at Chongming Dongtan, a national nature reserve established for waterbird conservation in the south Yellow Sea, in order to compare the characteristics of waterbird communities in four wetland types: restored wetlands, natural tidal wetlands, and two artificial wetlands (fish ponds and farmlands). We determined whether waterbird diversity and species composition differed among the wetland types. The results indicated that waterbird diversity, in terms of species richness, individual density, Shannon-Wiener diversity, functional diversity, and phylogenetic diversity, was generally similar in the restored and natural wetlands and was higher in the restored and natural wetlands than in fish ponds or farmlands. Most threatened species and exclusive species occurred in both natural and restored wetlands, but the overall species composition significantly differed between natural and restored wetlands. Non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis also indicated that waterbird community significantly differed among the wetland types. The results suggest that restored wetlands support substantial waterbird diversity but cannot replace natural wetlands because they lack the period tides that many tideland specialists (shorebirds) depend on. This study highlights the importance of protecting natural wetlands for waterbird conservation. We propose that both the diversity and species composition of wildlife communities should be considered in evaluating the effectiveness of habitat restoration for wildlife.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144061

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144061;
PII
S0048969720375926;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
756
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54063848
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES;
Descriptors DEI
BIOLOGICAL RECOVERY; HABITAT; WETLANDS; WILD ANIMALS
Descriptors DEC
ANIMALS; AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS; ECOSYSTEMS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.