Co-gasification of wastewater sludge and different feedstock: Feasibility study
Creators
- 1. Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, M2P2 UMR7340, Europôle de l'Arbois Bâtiment Laënnec, Hall C, 13454 Aix en Provence (France)
- 2. University of Johannesburg, Department of Civil Engineering Science, Kingsway Campus, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006 Johannesburg (South Africa)
- 3. Veolia Recherche et Innovation, 78520 Limay France (France)
Description
Gasification experiments were performed for several feedstocks alone (wastewater sludge, waste wood, reeds, olive pomace, solid recovered fuel, paper labels and plastic labels) using a fixed bed reactor operating in semi-batch conditions. In order to combine them in an optimal gasifying blend, the gasification behavior of each feedstock was compared with that of wastewater sludge through the following criteria: the raw feedstock proximate and ultimate composition, the solid conversion, the gas heating value, the pollutants release and the ashes melting. Operated alone, the conversion rate of the feedstocks after 58 min of solid residence time was over 77% of initial mass. The Syngas low heating value produced at 1123 K was in the range of 9.0 to 11.9 MJ m−3. The major concerns regarding the wastewater sludge were the pollutants precursors' release (NH3, COS…) and the ash slagging and fouling. The calculated slagging and fouling indexes were high also for olive pomace and for waste wood. Finally, among the possible blends studied the paper labels and plastic labels can be co-gasified with secondary and digested wastewater sludge without any restriction, reeds and solid recovered fuel can be blinded with secondary wastewater sludge without any restriction, a specific attention have to be taken to fouling when they are blended with digested wastewater sludge. The blend based on waste wood and olives pomace should be avoided for instance due to their ash slagging and fouling tendency. - Highlights: • All feedstock are recoverable by gasification. • Slagging and fouling is virtually more important to digested wastewater sludge compared to secondary waste water sludge. • The ash melting problems of sludge can be limited by blending it with other feedstock.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.003Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.003;
- PII
- S0961-9534(16)30052-6;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Journal Volume
- 89
- Journal Page Range
- p. 201-209
- ISSN
- 0961-9534
- CODEN
- BMSBEO
Conference
- Title
- 23. European biomass conference and exhibition
- Dates
- 1-4 Jun 2015
- Place
- Vienna (Austria)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 49061181
- Subject category
- S09: BIOMASS FUELS;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- AMMONIA; ASHES; BIOFUELS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FOULING; FUEL CANS; GASIFICATION; HEATING; MELTING; OLIVES; PACKED BEDS; PLASTICS; POLLUTANTS; REEDS; SLUDGES; WASTE WATER; WOOD
- Descriptors DEC
- ALTERNATIVE FUELS; COMBUSTION PRODUCTS; FOOD; FRUITS; FUELS; GRAMINEAE; HYDRIDES; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS; LILIOPSIDA; LIQUID WASTES; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MATERIALS; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; NITROGEN HYDRIDES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC POLYMERS; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PETROCHEMICALS; PETROLEUM PRODUCTS; PHASE TRANSFORMATIONS; PLANTS; POLYMERS; RESIDUES; SYNTHETIC MATERIALS; THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; WASTES; WATER
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.