Published April 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Crossflow turbulent production using hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes/large-eddy simulation approaches

  • 1. Air Force Research Laboratory, Aerospace systems directorate, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, 2130 8th St., OH 45433 (United States)
  • 2. Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 (United States)
  • 3. Department of Computer Science, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • DHRL simulation designed for scalar mixing and compared to IDDES. • Normal and inclined ethylene jet in Mach 2 crossflow with momentum ratio of 0.5. • Turbulent productions preserved for resolved and modeled portions of DHRL. • DHRL more consistent with experimental mean and variance ethylene concentration. • Inclined injection requires transfer of inflow RANS production into the interaction region. - Abstract: The objective of the study is to investigate the performance of a newly developed dynamic hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes/large-eddy simulation (DHRL) framework versus a traditional hybrid approach in the context of the crossflow mixing. An independent scalar-based transition parameter is introduced to partition the species turbulent production within DHRL. The models' capability in resolving turbulent structures, agreeing with experimental measurements, and transferring turbulent production between modeled and resolved parts of the domain are discussed. Unsteady simulations corresponding to non-reacting ethylene injected in Mach 2 air crossflow are performed. The simulations correspond to both normal and low-angled injection with a momentum ratio of 0.5. Time-averaged fuel concentrations are compared with experimental Raman scattering data and with simulation results using a traditional improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) model. For the normal injection case, both DHRL and IDDES show reasonably accurate results, although DHRL is more consistent with the measured concentrations. The inclined jet case requires a large modeled contribution to the unsteady region since jet breakup and transition is less pronounced than the normal injection case. DHRL is able to couple Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and large-eddy simulation (LES) model terms more effectively and produce concentration fields consistent with the experiment. IDDES fails to predict unsteadiness and produces concentration distributions with large discrepancies from the experiment.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2018.01.008

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2018.01.008;
PII
S0142727X17307294;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
Journal Volume
70
Journal Page Range
p. 15-27
ISSN
0142-727X
CODEN
IJHFD2

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
50051886
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING; S71: CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS;
Descriptors DEI
ETHYLENE; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; RAMAN EFFECT; REYNOLDS NUMBER
Descriptors DEC
ALKENES; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; HYDROCARBONS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; SIMULATION

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2017 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.