Assessment of ghost-cell based cut-cell method for large-eddy simulations of compressible flows at high Reynolds number
Creators
Description
Highlights: • A Cartesian cut-cell method is developed for fully compressible Navier–Stokes equations. • The developed method is assessed through applications on grids with coarse near-wall resolution. • The developed method is applied to perform LES of high Reynolds number flows. • The results from the developed method agree well with the reference data. • The developed method represents the flow physics more accurately than the other methods. - Abstract: Large-eddy simulations (LES) of high Reynolds number flows are performed using a non-body conformal method in conjunction with a wall model. We use a simple wall function to model the wall-shear stress and the truncation error of the numerical discretization to model the sub-grid scale turbulence (implicit LES), although these can be easily replaced if necessary. The validation cases are: turbulent flow through an inclined channel, turbulent flow over a wavy surface, and supersonic flow over a circular cylinder. Since the near-wall grids are naturally coarse, the key is to use a method that is capable of capturing the flow dynamics accurately in the vicinity of the interface. Towards the purpose, we develop a Cartesian cut-cell method, referred to as the ghost-cell based cut-cell method (GC-CCM), in the context of fully compressible solutions of Navier–Stokes equations. This method employs ghost-cells inside the solid interface such that the local spatial reconstruction remains consistent everywhere including in the vicinity of the boundary. In order to capture the near-wall flow behavior more accurately with coarse grids, this method decomposes cell faces of merged cells and computes fluxes through each decomposed segment separately. The objective of this work is to qualify whether the proposed method can accurately represent the high Reynolds number flows in the vicinity of immersed interfaces. To analyze the performance of the proposed method, we compare the results to the corresponding numerical results from the two other non-body conformal methods, namely the ghost-cell based immersed boundary method (GCIBM) and standard cut-cell method (S-CCM), that are implemented in the same numerical solver. The comparison demonstrates that the proposed method is capable of capturing near-wall flows relatively accurately with coarse grids
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2015.01.006Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2015.01.006;
- PII
- S0142-727X(15)00008-9;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow
- Journal Volume
- 53
- Journal Page Range
- p. 1-14
- ISSN
- 0142-727X
- CODEN
- IJHFD2
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 47029718
- Subject category
- S42: ENGINEERING;
- Descriptors DEI
- COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; CYLINDERS; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS; NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHEAR; STRESSES; SUPERSONIC FLOW; SURFACES; TURBULENT FLOW; WALLS
- Descriptors DEC
- COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS; EQUATIONS; FLUID FLOW; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; SIMULATION
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.