Energy, exergy, environmental and economic analysis of industrial fired heaters based on heat recovery and preheating techniques
- 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
- 2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia)
- 3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada E3B 5A3 (Canada)
- 4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, 43009 Kajang, Selangor (Malaysia)
Description
Highlights: • 4-E analysis of a typical industrial grade fired heater unit is studied. • This analysis is accomplished for the first time in this study. • Heat recovery and air preheating lead to substantial reduction in the fuel consumption. • The company's current costs are tremendously reduced by these methods. • The methods lead to mitigation in GHG emission and to reduction in the associated taxes. - Abstract: Fired heaters are ubiquitous in both the petroleum and petrochemical industries, due to it being vital in their day to day operations. They form major components in petroleum refineries, petrochemical facilities, and processing units. This study was commissioned in order to analyze the economic benefits of incorporating both heat recovery and air preheating methods into the existing fired heater units. Four fired heater units were analyzed from the energy and environmental point of views. Moreover, the second law efficiency and the rate of irreversibility were also analyzed via the exergy analysis. Both analyses was indicative of the fact that the heat recovery process enhances both the first and second law efficiencies while simultaneously assisting in the production of high and low pressure water steam. The implementation and usage of the process improves the thermal and exergy efficiencies from 63.4% to 71.7% and 49.4%, to 54.8%, respectively. Additionally, the heat recovery and air preheating methods leads to a substantial reduction in fuel consumption, in the realm of up to 7.4%, while also simultaneously decreasing heat loss and the irreversibility of the unit. Nevertheless, the results of the economic analysis posits that although utilizing an air preheater unit enhances the thermal performance of the system, due to the air preheater's capital and maintenance costs, incorporating an air preheater unit to an existing fired heater is not economically justifiable. Furthermore, the results of the sensitivity analysis and payback period showed that the economic results are highly susceptible to the interest rate, and the payback period for the most economical case is 2.6 years
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.03.008Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.03.008;
- PII
- S0196-8904(13)00151-9;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Journal Volume
- 71
- Journal Page Range
- p. 51-61
- ISSN
- 0196-8904
- CODEN
- ECMADL
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 46001020
- Subject category
- S32: ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION;
- Descriptors DEI
- AIR; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; EXERGY; FUEL CONSUMPTION; HEAT LOSSES; HEAT RECOVERY; HEAT TREATMENTS; HEATERS; PAYBACK PERIOD; PETROLEUM REFINERIES; REDUCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
- Descriptors DEC
- CHEMICAL REACTIONS; ECONOMICS; ENERGY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY LOSSES; ENERGY RECOVERY; ENERGY TRANSFER; FLUIDS; GASES; HEAT TRANSFER; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; LOSSES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2013 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.