Published 2013 | Version v1
Journal article

Assessment of effective radiation dose of an extremity CBCT, MSCT and conventional x ray for knee area using MOSFET dosemeters

  • 1. Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Haellstroemin katu 2a, FI-00560 Helsinki (Finland)
  • 2. Docrates Cancer Hospital, Saukonpaadenranta 2, FI-00180 Helsinki (Finland)
  • 3. Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere (Finland)
  • 4. Oral and Maxillofacial Unit Department of Ortholaryngology, University of Tampere, P.O. Box 2000, FI-33521 Tampere (Finland)
  • 5. HUS Helsinki Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4 POB 340, Helsinki, FI-00029 HUS (Finland)

Description

The objective of this study was to assess and compare the organ and effective doses in the knee area resulting from different commercially available multislice computed tomography devices (MSCT), one cone beam computed tomography device (CBCT) and one conventional X-ray radiography device using MOSFET dosemeters and an anthropomorphic RANDO knee phantom. Measurements of the MSCT devices resulted in effective doses ranging between 27 and 48 mSv. The CBCT measurements resulted in an effective dose of 12.6 mSv. The effective doses attained using the conventional radiography device were 1.8 mSv for lateral and 1.2 mSv for anterior-posterior projections. The effective dose resulting from conventional radiography was considerably lower than those recorded for the CBCT and MSCT devices. The MSCT effective dose results were two to four times higher than those measured on the CBCT device. This study demonstrates that CBCT can be regarded as a potential low-dose 3D imaging technique for knee examinations. (authors)

Availability note (English)

Available from doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct162

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Journal Volume
157
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 515-524
ISSN
0144-8420

Optional Information

Notes
41 refs