Published September 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Variation in zinc release from surface coatings as a function of methodology

  • 1. Elon University, Department of Chemistry, Elon, NC 27244 (United States)
  • 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Research and Emergency Response, 5995 Center Hill Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45224 (United States)

Description

Highlights: • CPSC and NIOSH methods used to track Zn release from coated surfaces. • CPSC method and water-based coating result in highest Zn release. • No statistical difference in Zn release when using the NIOSH method. • Vast majority of applied NPs (>90%) remain on coated surfaces. • Further development of surface screening tests for NP release is needed. Over the last decade the growth of "nano-enabled" products have exploded in both industrial and direct to consumer applications. One area of interest is surface coatings, including paints, stains and sealants. Large scale applications of the products raise questions about both short- and long-term effects to both human and environmental health. Release of nanoparticles (NPs) from surfaces as a function of dermal contact is recognized as a potential human exposure route. Several standardized methods to quantify nanomaterial release have been previously used. In the current study, two standardized method were used to quantify the total mass of NPs released during sampling. ZnO (NPs) were used as a case study as they are commonly added to surface coatings to increase UV resistance. Particles were dispersed in Milli-Q water or a deck stain and applied to sanded plywood surfaces. Total release of Zn due to simulated dermal contact was evaluated using the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) wipe methods. Additionally, three different sampling materials were tested. The total quantity of Zn released between the two methods was dependent upon the material used and how the ZnO was applied to the surface. Critically, less than 3% of the ZnO NPs applied to test surfaces was removed using either method. The results of this study demonstrate how different testing methodologies may result in varying estimates of human and environmental risk from NPs in surface coatings.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147907

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147907;
PII
S0048969721029788;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
788
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
54059053
Subject category
S77: NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY; S36: MATERIALS SCIENCE;
Descriptors DEI
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; NANOMATERIALS; NANOPARTICLES; SAMPLING; SURFACE COATING; SURFACES; ZINC; ZINC OXIDES
Descriptors DEC
CHALCOGENIDES; DEPOSITION; ELEMENTS; MATERIALS; METALS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PARTICLES; SIMULATION; ZINC COMPOUNDS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.