Published March 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Experimental analysis of dehumidification performance of counter and cross-flow liquid desiccant dehumidifiers

  • 1. Department of Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763 (Korea, Republic of)

Description

Highlights: • Dehumidification performances of the cross and the counter-flow liquid desiccant dehumidifiers were compared. • Empirical models of both liquid desiccant dehumidifiers were also derived. • The inlet air humidity ratio and the inlet solution temperature affect highly the counter-flow dehumidifier performance. • The counter-flow type showed better performance than the cross-flow type. -- Abstract: In a liquid desiccant dehumidifier, the air-to-solution flow direction plays an important role in the dehumidification performance and the physical size of the dehumidifier tower. In this research, the dehumidification performance of counter-flow and cross-flow liquid desiccant dehumidifiers were compared via a series of experiments carried out in the environmental test chamber. To predict the dehumidification performance of both flow type dehumidifiers in various operating conditions, empirical models returning the dehumidification effectiveness and the enthalpy effectiveness, which were adopted as performance indices, were also derived based on the experimental data. From the sensitivity analysis conducted by using the proposed empirical correlations, it was observed that when the inlet air humidity ratio increased from 10.1 g/kg to 22.7 g/kg, the dehumidification effectiveness and enthalpy effectiveness of the counter-flow liquid desiccant dehumidifier increased from 51.2% to 82.4% and 40.2% to 72.5%, respectively. Meanwhile, both effectiveness values of the cross-flow dehumidifier increased from 62.3% to 63.4% and 46.3% to 55.0%, respectively. Likewise, when inlet solution temperature varied from 15.2 to 31.1 °C, the dehumidification effectiveness and enthalpy effectiveness of the counter-flow type dehumidifier decreased from 71.7 to 45.4% and 64.4 to 47.3%, respectively, while those of a cross-flow type dehumidifier decreased from 65.3 to 54.8% and 55.8 to 45.2%. Consequently, one may conclude that the cross-flow liquid desiccant dehumidifier would provide relatively stable dehumidification performance regardless of the changes in operating parameter, but the cross-flow dehumidifier may have limited dehumidification performance, especially at the lower desiccant solution temperature and in highly humid process air conditions.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.01.006;
PII
S1359431118366663;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Thermal Engineering
Journal Volume
150
Journal Page Range
p. 210-223
ISSN
1359-4311
CODEN
ATENFT

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55003883
Subject category
S42: ENGINEERING;
Descriptors DEI
DEHUMIDIFIERS; DEHYDRATION; DESICCANTS; DRYING; ENTHALPY; HUMIDITY; PERFORMANCE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Descriptors DEC
MOISTURE; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.