Published October 1997
| Version v1
Journal article
New reactor a missed opportunity
Description
Government's claims that a new nuclear reactor at Lucas Heights will save life are questioned. The author also briefly considers why it will be preferable to use alternative radioisotope sources if at all possible. Rapid advancements in alternative production technologies (especially accelerators and spallation sources), good prospects for reliance on imported radioisotopes and strong competition between the various imaging modalities are advocated as rare opportunities for Australia to move away from reactor technology. Radioactive waste, possibility of using plutonium for nuclear weapons and safety issues are flagged as good reasons to be looking at alternatives to reactors for radioisotope production
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Search
- Journal Volume
- 28
- Journal Issue
- 9
- Journal Page Range
- p. 275-279.
- ISSN
- 0004-9549
- CODEN
- SRCHAA
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Australia
- Country of Input or Organization
- Australia
- INIS RN
- 29023630
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S07: ISOTOPES AND RADIATION SOURCES;
- Descriptors DEI
- ANSTO; CYCLOTRONS; IMPORTS; ISOTOPE PRODUCTION; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PUBLIC OPINION; RADIOACTIVE WASTES; RESEARCH REACTORS; SPALLATION
- Descriptors DEC
- ACCELERATORS; AUSTRALIAN ORGANIZATIONS; CYCLIC ACCELERATORS; MATERIALS; MEDICINE; NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS; NUCLEAR REACTIONS; RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS; REACTORS; RESEARCH AND TEST REACTORS; TRADE; WASTES
Optional Information
- Notes
- 17 refs.