Published May 2019 | Version v1
Journal article

Have China's provinces achieved their targets of energy intensity reduction? Reassessment based on nighttime lighting data

  • 1. School of Political Science and Public Administration, Wuhan University (China)
  • 2. Center for Social Security Studies, Wuhan University (China)
  • 3. Energy Studies Institute, National University of Singapore (Singapore)
  • 4. School of Low Carbon Economics, Hubei University of Economics (China)
  • 5. Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney (Australia)
  • 6. Center of Hubei Cooperative Innovation for Emissions Trading System (China)
  • 7. Economics and Management School, Wuhan University (China)
  • 8. School of Urban and Regional Science, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (China)

Description

Highlights: • Revised provincial GDP with nighttime lighting data in China. • Reassessed the target of energy intensity reduction using revised GDP growth rate. • Some provinces did not achieve the target of energy intensity reduction in the 11th FYP. • Alternative assessment should be included to improve the effectiveness of policy. -- Abstract: Energy intensity has been a major assessment indicator in the design of energy saving policies, and it is one of the eight binding indicators of the target responsibility system for officials' performance evaluation in the 11th Five-Year Plan in China. However, the accuracy of measurement of energy intensity depends to a large extent on the reliability of GDP data. This paper revises the GDP growth rate with nighttime lighting data and recalculates the rate of energy intensity reduction for each province during the 11th Five-Year Plan in China. Our results show that the GDP growth rate of some provinces has been exaggerated. Further, although the energy intensity of all provinces showed a significant downward trend during the 11th Five-Year Plan, some provinces failed to meet the target of energy intensity reduction. These results suggest that when designing energy conservation policies, cross-evaluation indicators should be included to improve the effective implementation of policies.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.014;
PII
S0301421519300151;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Energy Policy
Journal Volume
128
Journal Page Range
p. 276-283
ISSN
0301-4215
CODEN
ENPYAC

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
55007483
Subject category
S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
Descriptors DEI
DESIGN; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT; PERFORMANCE
Descriptors DEC
GOVERNMENT POLICIES

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.