A Comparison Study on the Integrated Risk Estimation for Various Power Systems
Creators
- 1. KAERI, Daejeon (Korea, Republic of)
Description
The objective of this study is to establish a system for the comparative analysis of the environmental impacts, risks, health effects, and social acceptance for various electricity generation systems and a computational framework and necessary databases. In this study, the second phase of the nuclear research and development program(2002-2004), the methodologies for the comparative analysis of the environmental impacts, risks, and health effects for various electricity generation systems was investigated and applied to reference power plants. The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology as a comparative analysis tool for the environmental impacts was adopted and applied to fossil-fueled and nuclear power plants. The scope of the analysis considered in this study are the construction, operation/fuel cycle), and demolition of each power generation system. In the risk analysis part, the empirical and analytical methods were adopted and applied to fossil-fueled and nuclear power plants. In the empirical risk assessment part, we collected historical experiences of worldwide energy-related accidents with fatalities over the last 30 years. The scope of the analysis considered in this study are the construction, operation (fuel cycle), and demolition stages of each power generation systems. The risks for the case of nuclear power plants which have potential releases of radioactive materials were estimated In a probabilistic way (PSA) by considering the occurrence of severe accidents and compared with the risks of other electricity generation systems. The health effects testimated as external cost) resulting from the operation of nuclear, coal, and hydro power systems were estimated and compared by using the program developed by the IAEA. Regarding a comprehensive comparison of the various power systems, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method is introduced to aggregate the diverse information under conflicting decision criteria. Social aspect is treated by a web-based questionnaire method to collect the subjective opinions of the expert groups, while economic, health, and environmental aspects are dealt with by the objective information obtained from the literatures available, assessment results, or a calculation output. In the third phase of nuclear research and development program (2005-2006), the system and databases for the integrated risk comparison for various power systems have been established by combining the methodologies introduced in the second phase of the nuclear research and' development program
Availability note (English)
Also available from KAERI
Files
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Imprint Pagination
- 279 p.
- Report number
- KAERI/RR--2739/2006
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Korea, Republic of
- Country of Input or Organization
- Korea, Republic of
- INIS RN
- 43041396
- Subject category
- S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
- Descriptors DEI
- COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS; FUEL CYCLE; HAZARDS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; POWER SYSTEMS
- Descriptors DEC
- ENERGY SYSTEMS; EVALUATION; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS
Optional Information
- Notes
- 160 refs, 109 figs, 124 tabs