Physics-informed reinforcement learning optimization of nuclear assembly design
Creators
- 1. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 (United States)
- 2. MIT Quest for Intelligence, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 (United States)
- 3. Nuclear Fuels Department, Exelon Corporation, Kennett Square, PA 19348 (United States)
- 4. Corporate Strategy Department, Exelon Corporation, Washington, DC 20001 (United States)
Description
Optimization of nuclear fuel assemblies if performed effectively, will lead to fuel efficiency improvement, cost reduction, and safety assurance. However, assembly optimization involves solving high-dimensional and computationally expensive combinatorial problems. As such, fuel designers' expert judgement has commonly prevailed over the use of stochastic optimization (SO) algorithms such as genetic algorithms and simulated annealing. To improve the state-of-art, we explore a class of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, namely, reinforcement learning (RL) in this work. We propose a physics-informed AI optimization methodology by establishing a connection through reward shaping between RL and the tactics fuel designers follow in practice by moving fuel rods in the assembly to meet specific constraints and objectives. The methodology utilizes RL algorithms, deep Q learning and proximal policy optimization, and compares their performance to SO algorithms. The methodology is applied on two boiling water reactor assemblies of low-dimensional ( combinations) and high-dimensional ( combinations) natures. The results demonstrate that RL is more effective than SO in solving high dimensional problems, i.e., 10 × 10 assembly, through embedding expert knowledge in form of game rules and effectively exploring the search space. For a given computational resources and timeframe relevant to fuel designers, RL algorithms outperformed SO through finding more feasible patterns, 4–5 times more than SO, and through increasing search speed, as indicated by the RL outstanding computational efficiency. The results of this work clearly demonstrate RL effectiveness as another decision support tool for nuclear fuel assembly optimization.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110966Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110966;
- PII
- S002954932030460X;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Nuclear Engineering and Design
- Journal Volume
- 372
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0029-5493
- CODEN
- NEDEAU
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Netherlands
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54083782
- Subject category
- S11: NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS; S22: GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS;
- Descriptors DEI
- BWR TYPE REACTORS; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; DESIGN; FUEL ASSEMBLIES; FUEL RODS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MACHINE LEARNING; NUCLEAR FUELS; OPTIMIZATION; REACTOR SAFETY; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES
- Descriptors DEC
- ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ENERGY SOURCES; ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS; FUEL ELEMENTS; FUELS; LEARNING; MATERIALS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; POWER REACTORS; REACTOR COMPONENTS; REACTOR MATERIALS; REACTORS; SAFETY; SIMULATION; THERMAL REACTORS; WATER COOLED REACTORS; WATER MODERATED REACTORS
Optional Information
- Notes
- Published by Elsevier B.V.