The IRSN Risk Perception Barometer: analyzing the 1997 - 2008 period and comparing expert, public and residents of a nuclear facility perceptions
Creators
- El Jammal, Marie H.1
- International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA), Fontenay-aux-Roses (France)
- Sociedad Argentina de Radioproteccion (SAR), Buenos Aires (Argentina)
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna (Austria)
- Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Washington, DC (United States)
- World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva (Switzerland)
- 1. Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire, Fontenay-aux-Roses (France). Development, and External Relations Div.
Description
Full text: Since 1997, IRSN conducts a yearly survey designed to understand how the French population perceives risk: the IRSN barometer. In this survey, 30 risks are investigated from three different angles: a) Seriousness of the risk; b) Trust in the authorities; c) Credibility of information given about these risks. The 30 risks include situations widely covered by the media (traffic accidents, smoking, alcohol, etc.), as well as situations of which the public can be unaware (such as radon in homes) and situations perceived as low risk (X-rays, noise, etc.). The list includes nuclear power plants, nuclear waste storage, Chernobyl pollution impacts, chemical industries, chemical waste, transportation of hazardous chemicals, etc. Statistical analysis of the answers highlighted five groups of risks in relation with a common rationale of perception by the French people. This will be presented as the first part of the paper. The conclusion will show that the risk perceptions of the French population are not at all versatile. Their perception logic is based on the perceived seriousness of the risk, on their 'trust in the protective measures taken by the French authorities' and on the perceived credibility of information. Risk perception varies greatly with age, gender, culture and level of education. We know this with the IRSN Barometer and others opinion pools. However, few surveys are carried out among experts in risk. Do they have a different perception of risk from the general public? It's the subject of a study entitled PERPLEX (Perception of Risk by the Public and Experts) who was realized in October 2004. This will be presented in the second part of the paper. The same question can be asked for the population who live near a nuclear power plant or other nuclear facility. So, in November 2007, 318 residents in the vicinity of twenty nuclear facility have answered at the IRSN's annual barometer questionnaire. The results of these three surveys will be presented in the paper. (author)
Availability note (English)
Available from INIS in electronic formFiles
40062538.pdf
Files
(30.8 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:345d293057e990cb981a64e486daa211
|
30.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Publishing Information
- Publisher
- SAR
- Imprint Place
- Buenos Aires (Argentina)
- Imprint Pagination
- 2 p.
- Report number
- INIS-AR-C--605
Conference
- Title
- 12. International congress of the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA): Strengthening radiation protection worldwide
- Acronym
- IRPA 12
- Dates
- 19-24 Oct 2008
- Place
- Buenos Aires (Argentina)
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Argentina
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 40062538
- Subject category
- S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Conference
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCIDENTS; ATTITUDES; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; CHEMICAL WASTES; EDUCATION; HEALTH HAZARDS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; RADIOACTIVE WASTES; RISK ASSESSMENT; X RADIATION
- Descriptors DEC
- ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; HAZARDS; INDUSTRY; IONIZING RADIATIONS; MATERIALS; NONRADIOACTIVE WASTES; NUCLEAR FACILITIES; POWER PLANTS; RADIATIONS; RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS; THERMAL POWER PLANTS; WASTES
Optional Information
- Notes
- Abstract only; 1 fig.