Published August 5, 2005 | Version v1
Journal article

Iterative springback compensation of NUMISHEET benchmark no. 1

  • 1. INPRO Innovationsgesellschaft fuer fortgeschrittene Produktionssysteme in der Fahrzeugindustrie mbH, Hallerstrasse 1, D-10587 Berlin (Germany)
  • 2. Netherlands Institute for Metals Research, Rotterdamseweg 137, 2628 AL Delft (Netherlands)
  • 3. University of Twente, Faculty of Engineering Technology, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede (Netherlands)

Description

Upon unloading after the forming stage, a sheet metal product will spring back due to internal stresses. Springback is a major problem for process-planning engineers. In industrial practise, deformations due to springback are compensated manually, by doing extensive measurements on prototype parts, and altering the tool geometry by hand. This is a time consuming and costly operation. In this paper the application of two compensation algorithms, based on the finite element simulation of the forming process are discussed. The smooth displacement adjustment (SDA) method and the springforward (SF) method have been applied to several industrial products, such as the NUMISHEET 2005 benchmark no. 1. With the SDA method successful compensations have been carried out. For the SF method some principal problems remain

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
AIP Conference Proceedings
Journal Volume
778
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 328-333
ISSN
0094-243X
CODEN
APCPCS

Conference

Title
6. international conference and workshop on numerical simulation of 3D sheet metal forming process
Acronym
NUMISHEET 2005
Dates
15-19 Aug 2005
Place
Detroit, MI (United States)

INIS

Optional Information

Notes
(c) 2005 American Institute of Physics