Published December 1, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article

Treatment of meningioma and glioma with protons and carbon ions

  • 1. Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), 69120 Heidelberg (Germany)
  • 2. Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg (Germany)
  • 3. Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg (Germany)
  • 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg (Germany)
  • 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 505 S 45th Street, Omaha, NE 68106 (United States)

Description

The rapid rise of particle therapy across the world necessitates evidence to justify its ever-increasing utilization. This narrative review summarizes the current status of these technologies on treatment of both meningiomas and gliomas, the most common benign and malignant primary brain tumors, respectively. Proton beam therapy (PBT) for meningiomas displays high rates of long-term local control, low rates of symptomatic deterioration, along with the potential for safe dose-escalation in select (but not necessarily routine) cases. PBT is also associated with low adverse events and maintenance of functional outcomes, which have implications for quality of life and cost-effectiveness measures going forward. Data on carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) are limited; existing series describe virtually no high-grade toxicities and high local control. Regarding the few available data on low-grade gliomas, PBT provides opportunities to dose-escalate while affording no increase of severe toxicities, along with maintaining appropriate quality of life. Although dose-escalation for low-grade disease has been less frequently performed than for glioblastoma, PBT and CIRT continue to be utilized for the latter, and also have potential for safer re-irradiation of high-grade gliomas. For both neoplasms, the impact of superior dosimetric profiles with endpoints such as neurocognitive decline and neurologic funcionality, are also discussed to the extent of requiring more data to support the utility of particle therapy. Caveats to these data are also described, such as the largely retrospective nature of the available studies, patient selection, and heterogeneity in patient population as well as treatment (including mixed photon/particle treatment). Nevertheless, multiple prospective trials (which may partially attenuate those concerns) are also discussed. In light of the low quantity and quality of available data, major questions remain regarding economic concerns as well.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0924-7; Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5710063

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Radiation Oncology (Online)
Journal Volume
12
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
1748-717X

INIS

Country of Publication
United Kingdom
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
49082495
Subject category
S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
Descriptors DEI
CARBON IONS; GLIOMAS; PROTON BEAMS; RADIATION DOSES; RADIOTHERAPY
Descriptors DEC
BEAMS; CHARGED PARTICLES; DISEASES; DOSES; IONS; MEDICINE; NEOPLASMS; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; NUCLEON BEAMS; PARTICLE BEAMS; RADIOLOGY; THERAPY

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) The Author(s). 2017
Notes
PMCID: PMC5710063; PMID: 29195506; PUBLISHER-ID: 924; OAI: oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:5710063