The use of liquefied natural gas as an alternative fuel in freight transport – Evidence from a driver's point of view
Creators
- 1. University of São Paulo, Institute of Energy and Environment, Avenida Professor Luciano Gualberto, 1289, 05508-010, São Paulo, SP (Brazil)
- 2. Imperial College London, Department of Chemical Engineering, South Kensington, London, SW7 2BU (United Kingdom)
- 3. University of São Paulo, School of Arts, Science Humanities, Rua Arlindo Béttio, 1000, São Paulo, SP (Brazil)
Description
Highlights: • LNG vehicles will have to overcome barriers related to truck drivers' preferences. • Truck owners' preferences are not significantly different from employed drivers. • Young drivers care about technical aspects, older ones about payment conditions. • Diffusion of LNG vehicles will depend on tax incentives, fuel price and warranty. Nearly one-quarter of global greenhouse gas emissions are from the transport sector and around 30% of this are from road freight transport. Seeking to diversify the energy matrix and to reduce air pollution, we studied performance, emissions, and advantages/disadvantages of several alternative fuels compared to the conventional one (Diesel). This paper aims to analyze the driver's view about the use of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) in freight transport and set policy recommendations about it. A survey was conducted through a structure questionnarie in São Paulo (Brazil) to evaluate different aspects related to truck drivers in the use of LNG fuel technology. The results show that despite the lack of knowledge on LNG trucks, most of the respondents related it to an environmentally friendly and more economic option. Despite the higher purchase price, 68% of them would pay a loan for a longer period to acquire the technology. The main aspect about buying a conventional truck is safety (22.4%), however for LNG trucks, a tax reduction (23.1%) is the most crucial one. Lack of knowledge is a considerable barrier to the introduction of LNG for freight transport regarding technology, performance, prices, maintenance, and safety, which represent uncertainty when acquiring the technology.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112106Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112106;
- PII
- S030142152030817X;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 149
- Journal Page Range
- vp.
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 54023861
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; S03: NATURAL GAS;
- Descriptors DEI
- AIR POLLUTION; ALTERNATIVE FUELS; EMISSION; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; GREENHOUSE GASES; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; PERFORMANCE; PRICES; RECOMMENDATIONS; TRUCKS
- Descriptors DEC
- ENERGY SOURCES; FLUIDS; FOSSIL FUELS; FUEL GAS; FUELS; GAS FUELS; GASES; GOVERNMENT POLICIES; LIQUEFIED GASES; LIQUIDS; NATURAL GAS; POLLUTION; VEHICLES
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.