Published January 29, 2024 | Version v1
Journal article

Continuum contact model for friction between graphene sheets that accounts for surface anisotropy and curvature

  • 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur UP 208016 India
  • 2. Aachen Institute for Advanced Study in Computational Engineering Science (AICES), RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany
  • 3. Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
  • 4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam 781039, India

Description

Understanding the interaction mechanics between graphene layers and coaxial carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is essential for modeling graphene and CNT-based nanoelectromechanical systems. This work proposes a new continuum contact model to study interlayer interactions between curved graphene sheets. The continuum model is calibrated and validated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. These are carried out employing the reactive empirical bond order (REBO)+Lennard-Jones (LJ) potential to model the interactions within a sheet, while the LJ, Kolmogorov-Crespi (KC), and Lebedeva potentials are used to model the interactions between sheets. The continuum contact model is formulated for separation distances greater than 0.29 nm, when sliding contact becomes nondissipative and can be described by a potential. In this regime, sheet deformations are sufficiently small and do not affect the sheet interactions substantially. This allows to treat the master contact surface as rigid, thus simplifying the contact formulation greatly. The model calibration is conducted systematically for a sequence of different stackings using existing and newly proposed ansatz functions. The calibrated continuum model is then implemented in a curvilinear finite-element (FE) shell formulation to investigate the pull-out and twisting interactions between coaxial CNTs. The resisting pull-out forces and torques depend strongly on the chirality of the considered CNTs. The absolute differences between FE and MD results are very small and can be attributed to model assumptions and loading conditions.

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1103/PhysRevB.109.035435;
arXiv
arXiv:2305.11121;
Crossref Funder ID
10.13039/501100001659;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Physical Review B
Journal Volume
109
Journal Issue
3
Journal Page Range
24 pgs.
ISSN
1550-235X

Optional Information

Copyright
©2024 American Physical Society
Contract/Grant/Project number
SA1822/8-1
Notes
Contact Email: roger.sauer@pg.edu.pl; sauer@aices.rwth-aachen.de; Record automatically processed
Funding organization
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft