Published March 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Climate change and landscape development in post-closure safety assessment of solid radioactive waste disposal: Results of an initiative of the IAEA

  • 1. Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB, Evenemangsgatan 13, 169 79, Solna (Sweden)
  • 2. Mike Thorne and Associates Limited, Quarry Cottage, Hamsterley, Bishop Auckland, DL13 3NJ (United Kingdom)
  • 3. National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste, Hardstrasse 73, Wettingen (Switzerland)
  • 4. Public Health England, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London (United Kingdom)
  • 5. Arbonaut Oy, Kaislakatu, 280130, Joensuu (Finland)
  • 6. EnviroCase Ltd, Hallituskatu 1 D 4, 28100, Pori (Finland)
  • 7. Universität Hamburg - Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker Centre for Science and Peace Research, Beim Schlump 83, 20144, Hamburg (Germany)
  • 8. Aleksandria Sciences Limited, Unit 44a Avenue 2, Storforth Lane Trading Estate Hasland, Chesterfield, Derbyshire (United Kingdom)
  • 9. Radioactive Waste Management Ltd, Building 587, Curie Avenue, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, Oxfordshire (United Kingdom)
  • 10. Posiva Oy, Olkiluoto, 27160, Eurajoki (Finland)
  • 11. Fortum Power and Heat Oy, Keilaniementie 1, 02150, Espoo (Finland)
  • 12. Saanio & Riekkola Oy, Laulukuja 4, FI-00420, Helsinki (Finland)
  • 13. School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Road, Bristol, BS8 1SS (United Kingdom)

Description

Highlights: • An approach for addressing climate change and landscape evolution within post closure performance assessments has been developed. • The approach provides a framework for future assessment work that is consistent with international recommendations and guidance. • Global climate model results at a 200 km scale have been generated in this project using a newly developed emulator. • Case studies have been reviewed and evaluated to demonstrate the value of a step-by-step approach in building confidence. • Long-term climate modelling is sufficiently developed to define reference futures for use in landscape development modelling. - Abstract: The International Atomic Energy Agency has coordinated an international project addressing climate change and landscape development in post-closure safety assessments of solid radioactive waste disposal. The work has been supported by results of parallel on-going research that has been published in a variety of reports and peer reviewed journal articles. The project is due to be described in detail in a forthcoming IAEA report. Noting the multi-disciplinary nature of post-closure safety assessments, here, an overview of the work is given to provide researchers in the broader fields of radioecology and radiological safety assessment with a review of the work that has been undertaken. It is hoped that such dissemination will support and promote integrated understanding and coherent treatment of climate change and landscape development within an overall assessment process. The key activities undertaken in the project were: identification of the key processes that drive environmental change (mainly those associated with climate and climate change), and description of how a relevant future may develop on a global scale; development of a methodology for characterising environmental change that is valid on a global scale, showing how modelled global changes in climate can be downscaled to provide information that may be needed for characterising environmental change in site-specific assessments, and illustrating different aspects of the methodology in a number of case studies that show the evolution of site characteristics and the implications for the dose assessment models. Overall, the study has shown that quantitative climate and landscape modelling has now developed to the stage that it can be used to define an envelope of climate and landscape change scenarios at specific sites and under specific greenhouse-gas emissions assumptions that is suitable for use in quantitative post-closure performance assessments. These scenarios are not predictions of the future, but are projections based on a well-established understanding of the important processes involved and their impacts on different types of landscape. Such projections support the understanding of, and selection of, plausible ranges of scenarios for use in post-closure safety assessments.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.12.006

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.12.006;
PII
S0265931X17308743;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
Journal Volume
183
Journal Page Range
p. 41-53
ISSN
0265-931X
CODEN
JERAEE

Optional Information

Notes
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.