Published January 20, 1995 | Version v1
Journal article

Reusable space tug concepts

Creators

  • 1. Martin Marietta Astronautics, P.O. Box 179 (M/S: S-5060), Denver, Colorado 80201 (United States)

Description

Initial findings indicate that a space tug transportation system could potentially support up to 30 to 40 missions a year with cost savings being mission dependent. This study identified two large expensable launch system class government missions, projected to fly approximately four times a year, which could yield a total annual savings of approximately $500 million. With the nominal flight rate of four flights annually, a minimum savings of $130 million per flight is projected. Based on this cost savings, recovery of the non-recurring costs of design, development, test and evaluation of the space tug should occur in five to ten years. For the remaining missions considered, the payload delivery capabilities of the space tug met or exceeded those of existing orbital transfer systems, the payload delivery capabilities of the space tug met or exceeded those of existing orbital transfer systems, but did not produce sufficient economic benefit to justify its use. However, even for these ''economically insupportable'' missions, a space tug might provide the existing launch systems additional flexibility and/or payload capability, enhancing the potential of supporting future commercial, civil, and defense missions. copyright 1995 American Institute of Physics

Additional details

Publishing Information

Journal Title
AIP Conference Proceedings
Journal Volume
324
Journal Issue
1
Journal Page Range
p. 641-649.
ISSN
0094-243X
CODEN
APCPCS

Conference

Title
12. symposium on space nuclear power and propulsion.
Dates
8-12 Jan 1995.
Place
Albuquerque, NM (United States).

INIS

Country of Publication
United States
Country of Input or Organization
United States
INIS RN
27002440
Subject category
S21: SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS; S42: ENGINEERING;
Resource subtype / Literary indicator
Conference
Descriptors DEI
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DESIGN; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; POWER SYSTEMS; PROPULSION SYSTEMS; REACTORS; SPACE VEHICLES
Descriptors DEC
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; VEHICLES

Optional Information

Secondary number(s)
CONF-950110--.