Low-carbon technology diffusion in the decarbonization of the power sector: Policy implications
Creators
- 1. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072 (China)
- 2. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100190 (China)
- 3. School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 (United States)
- 4. School of Architecture & Built Environment, Entrepreneurship, Commercialisation and Innovation Centre (ECIC), The University of Adelaide, SA 5005 (Australia)
- 5. College of Economics, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632 (China)
- 6. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072 (China)
Description
Highlights: • An analytical framework by embedding learning curves in TIMES model is proposed. • Technology choices, resource utilization, economic effects etc. are identified. • The impacts of varied mitigation policies on the power sector are examined. • Alternative energies and efficient coal power are preferred for CO2 reduction. • Policy makers should balance CO2 reduction, resource saving, cost increment etc. - Abstract: The Chinese power sector faces a significant challenge in attempting to mitigate its CO2 emissions while meeting its fast-growing demand for electricity. To address this challenge, an analytical framework is proposed that incorporates technological learning curves in a technology optimization model. The framework is employed to evaluate the technology trajectories, resource utilization and economic impacts in the power sector of Tianjin in 2005–2050. Using multi-scenario analysis, this study reveals that CO2 emissions could be significantly reduced if relevant mitigation policies are introduced. The main technologies adopted are ultra-super-critical combustion, integrated gasification combined cycle, wind power, hydropower, biomass power, solar photovoltaic power and solar thermal power. Despite uncertainties, nuclear power and CO2 capture and storage technology could be cost competitive in the future. The CO2 emissions cap policy has the advantage of realizing an explicit goal in the target year, while the renewable energy policy contributes to more cumulative CO2 emissions reduction and coal savings. A carbon tax of 320 CNY/ton CO2 would contribute to early renewable energy development and more CO2 reduction in the short run. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to examine the impacts on the power system of learning rates, technology cost reductions and energy fuel price trajectories.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.001Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.001;
- PII
- S0301421518300715;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Energy Policy
- Journal Volume
- 116
- Journal Page Range
- p. 344-356
- ISSN
- 0301-4215
- CODEN
- ENPYAC
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United Kingdom
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 51037088
- Subject category
- S29: ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY;
- Descriptors DEI
- AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT; BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHINA; COAL; COMBINED CYCLES; EMISSION; GASIFICATION; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; NUCLEAR POWER; POWER SYSTEMS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOLAR CELLS; WIND POWER
- Descriptors DEC
- ASIA; CARBON COMPOUNDS; CARBON OXIDES; CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS; CHALCOGENIDES; DIRECT ENERGY CONVERTERS; ELECTRIC POWER; ENERGY SOURCES; ENERGY SYSTEMS; EQUIPMENT; FOSSIL FUELS; FUELS; MATERIALS; OXIDES; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS; PHOTOELECTRIC CELLS; PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS; POLLUTION ABATEMENT; POWER; RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES; SOLAR EQUIPMENT; THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLES
Optional Information
- Notes
- © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.