Diagnostic accuracy of texture analysis and machine learning for quantification of liver fibrosis in MRI. Correlation with MR elastography and histopathology
Creators
- 1. University of Zurich (Switzerland)
- 2. Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (United States)
- 3. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich (Switzerland)
- 4. Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich (Switzerland)
- 5. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich (Switzerland)
Description
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of texture analysis (TA)–derived parameters combined with machine learning (ML) of non-contrast-enhanced T1w and T2w fat-saturated (fs) images with MR elastography (MRE) for liver fibrosis quantification. In this IRB-approved prospective study, liver MRIs of participants with suspected chronic liver disease who underwent liver biopsy between August 2015 and May 2018 were analyzed. Two readers blinded to clinical and histopathological findings performed TA. The participants were categorized into no or low-stage (0–2) and high-stage (3–4) fibrosis groups. Confusion matrices were calculated using a support vector machine combined with principal component analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of ML-based TA of liver fibrosis and MRE was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Histopathology served as reference standard. A total of 62 consecutive participants (40 men; mean age ± standard deviation, 48 ± 13 years) were included. The accuracy of TA and ML on T1w was 85.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.7–97.0) and 61.9% (95% CI 38.4–81.9) on T2w fs for classification of liver fibrosis into low-stage and high-stage fibrosis. The AUC for TA on T1w was similar to MRE (0.82 [95% CI 0.59–0.95] vs. 0.92 [95% CI 0.71–0.99], p = 0.41), while the AUC for T2w fs was significantly lower compared to MRE (0.57 [95% CI 0.34–0.78] vs. 0.92 [95% CI 0.71–0.99], p = 0.008). Our results suggest that liver fibrosis can be quantified with TA-derived parameters of T1w when combined with a ML algorithm with similar accuracy compared to MRE.
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06831-8Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- European Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 30
- Journal Issue
- 8
- Journal Page Range
- p. 4675-4685
- ISSN
- 0938-7994
- CODEN
- EURAE3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 51105960
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- ACCURACY; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOPSY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; CORRELATIONS; DIAGNOSIS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM DISEASES; ELASTICITY; FIBROSIS; HISTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; LIVER; NMR IMAGING; RELAXATION TIME; TEXTURE; WEIGHTING FUNCTIONS
- Descriptors DEC
- BODY; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM; DISEASES; EVALUATION; FUNCTIONS; GLANDS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; ORGANS; PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES; PROCESSING