Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Without or With Applicator in Place for Target Definition in Cervix Cancer Brachytherapy
Creators
- 1. Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (Austria)
- 2. Department of Radiotherapy, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (Austria)
- 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Gran Canaria University Hospital, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (Spain)
- 4. Institute of Physics and Technology, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk Oblast (Russian Federation)
- 5. Department of Clinical Oncology, Medical University of Alexandria, Alexandria (Egypt)
Description
Purpose: To define, in the setting of cervical cancer, to what extent information from additional pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without the brachytherapy applicator improves conformity of CT-based high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR) contours, compared with the MRI for various tumor stages (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stages I-IVA). Methods and Materials: The CTVHR was contoured in 39 patients with cervical cancer (FIGO stages I-IVA) (1) on CT images based on clinical information (CTVHR-CTClinical) alone; and (2) using an additional MRI before brachytherapy, without the applicator (CTVHR-CTpre-BT MRI). The CT contours were compared with reference contours on MRI with the applicator in place (CTVHR-MRIref). Width, height, thickness, volumes, and topography were analyzed. Results: The CT-MRIref differences hardly varied in stage I tumors (n=8). In limited-volume stage IIB and IIIB tumors (n=19), CTVHR-CTpre-BT MRI–MRIref volume differences (2.6 cm3 [IIB], 7.3 cm3 [IIIB]) were superior to CTVHR-CTClinical–MRIref (11.8 cm3 [IIB], 22.9 cm3 [IIIB]), owing to significant improvement of height and width (P<.05). In advanced disease (n=12), improved agreement with MR volume, width, and height was achieved for CTVHR-CTpre-BT MRI. In 5 of 12 cases, MRIref contours were partly missed on CT. Conclusions: Pre-BT MRI helps to define CTVHR before BT implantation appropriately, if only CT images with the applicator in place are available for BT planning. Significant improvement is achievable in limited-volume stage IIB and IIIB tumors. In more advanced disease (extensive IIB to IVA), improvement of conformity is possible but may be associated with geographic misses. Limited impact on precision of CTVHR-CT is expected in stage IB tumors.
Availability note (English)
Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.023Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.023;
- PII
- S0360-3016(15)26479-6;
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
- Journal Volume
- 94
- Journal Issue
- 3
- Journal Page Range
- p. 588-597
- ISSN
- 0360-3016
- CODEN
- IOBPD3
INIS
- Country of Publication
- United States
- Country of Input or Organization
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
- INIS RN
- 48093705
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Descriptors DEI
- BRACHYTHERAPY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGES; NEOPLASMS; NMR IMAGING
- Descriptors DEC
- DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; MEDICINE; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; RADIOTHERAPY; THERAPY; TOMOGRAPHY
Optional Information
- Copyright
- Copyright (c) 2016 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.