There is a newer version of the record available.

Published 2024 | Version v1
Journal article

External validation, radiological evaluation, and development of deep learning automatic lung segmentation in contrast-enhanced chest CT

  • 1. Academic Department of Radiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, S10 2JF, Sheffield (United States)
  • 2. Department of Infection, Immunity & Cardiovascular Disease, Medical School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield (United Kingdom)
  • 3. 3DLab, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield (United Kingdom)
  • 4. Stanford Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Imaging (AIMI), Stanford University, Sheffield (United States)

Description

There is a need for CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) lung segmentation models. Clinical translation requires radiological evaluation of model outputs, understanding of limitations, and identification of failure points. This multicentre study aims to develop an accurate CTPA lung segmentation model, with evaluation of outputs in two diverse patient cohorts with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). This retrospective study develops an nnU-Net-based segmentation model using data from two specialist centres (UK and USA). Model was trained (n = 37), tested (n = 12), and clinically evaluated (n = 176) on a diverse 'real-world' cohort of 225 PH patients with volumetric CTPAs. Dice score coefficient (DSC) and normalised surface distance (NSD) were used for testing. Clinical evaluation of outputs was performed by two radiologists who assessed clinical significance of errors. External validation was performed on heterogenous contrast and non-contrast scans from 28 ILD patients. A total of 225 PH and 28 ILD patients with diverse demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated. Mean accuracy, DSC, and NSD scores were 0.998 (95% CI 0.9976, 0.9989), 0.990 (0.9840, 0.9962), and 0.983 (0.9686, 0.9972) respectively. There were no segmentation failures. On radiological review, 82% and 71% of internal and external cases respectively had no errors. Eighteen percent and 25% respectively had clinically insignificant errors. Peripheral atelectasis and consolidation were common causes for suboptimal segmentation. One external case (0.5%) with patulous oesophagus had a clinically significant error. State-of-the-art CTPA lung segmentation model provides accurate outputs with minimal clinical errors on evaluation across two diverse cohorts with PH and ILD. Clinical translation of artificial intelligence models requires radiological review and understanding of model limitations. This study develops an externally validated state-of-the-art model with robust radiological review. Intended clinical use is in techniques such as lung volume or parenchymal disease quantification.

Additional details

Identifiers

Publishing Information

Journal Title
European Radiology (Internet)
Journal Volume
34
Journal Issue
4
Journal Page Range
p. 2727-2737
ISSN
1432-1084
CODEN
EURAE3