Published June 15, 2008 | Version v1
Journal article

Emergency planning and the Control of Major Accident Hazards (COMAH/Seveso II) Directive: An approach to determine the public safety zone for toxic cloud releases

  • 1. Department of Public Health, Health Services Executive - Southern Area, Sarsfield House, Sarsfield Road, Wilton, Cork (Ireland)
  • 2. Cork County Fire and Rescue Service, North Mall, Cork (Ireland)
  • 3. Cork Joint Emergency Planning Office, Health Services Executive - Southern Area, Unit 5 South Ring Business Park, Kinsale Road, Wilton, Cork (Ireland)

Description

The EU Control of Major Accidents Hazards Directive (Seveso II) requires an external emergency plan for each top tier site. This paper sets out a method to build the protection of public health into emergency planning for Seveso sites in the EU. The method involves the review of Seveso site details prescribed under the directive. The site safety report sets out the potential accident scenarios. The safety report's worst-case scenario, and chemical involved, is used as the basis for the external emergency plan. A decision was needed on the appropriate threshold value to use as the level of concern to protect public health. The definitions of the regulatory standards (air quality standards and occupational standards) in use were studied, how they are derived and for what purpose. The 10 min acute exposure guideline level (AEGL) for a chemical is recommended as the threshold value to inform decisions taken to protect public health from toxic cloud releases. The area delimited by AEGL 1 defines the population who may be concerned about being exposed. They need information based on comprehensive risk assessment. The area delimited by AEGL 2 defines the population for long-term surveillance when indicated and may include first responders. The area delimited by AEGL 3 defines the population who may present acutely to the medical services. It ensures that the emergency responders site themselves safely. A standard methodology facilitates discussions with plant operators and concerned public. Examples show how the methodology can be adapted to suit explosive risk and response to fire

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.065

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.065;
PII
S0304-3894(07)01472-0;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Journal Volume
154
Journal Issue
1-3
Journal Page Range
p. 355-365
ISSN
0304-3894
CODEN
JHMAD9

INIS

Country of Publication
Netherlands
Country of Input or Organization
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
INIS RN
40036181
Subject category
S54: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; S61: RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY;
Descriptors DEI
ACCIDENTS; ACUTE EXPOSURE; AIR QUALITY; EMERGENCY PLANS; HEALTH HAZARDS; HUMAN POPULATIONS; PLANNING; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEWS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SAFETY REPORTS; TOXICITY
Descriptors DEC
DOCUMENT TYPES; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY; HAZARDS; POPULATIONS

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.