Published June 2021 | Version v1
Journal article

Elucidating the quantitative characterization of atmospheric oxidation capacity in Beijing, China

  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029 (China)
  • 2. Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, Fujian 361021 (China)
  • 3. State Key Joint Laboratory or Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing (China)

Description

Highlights: • Newly developed indexes were used to elucidate the atmospheric oxidation capacity (AOC). • Well-defined seasonal and diurnal patterns of AOC were found in urban and suburban Beijing. • AOC was dominated by oxidation of CO and alkenes in summer and of CO and NO2 in winter. • The dominate contributor to AOC was OH and ozone during the daytime and nighttime, respectively. • The heterogeneous oxidation processes contributed substantially to the underestimation of AOC. The atmospheric oxidizing capacity (AOC) is the essential driving force of tropospheric chemistry, but its quantitative representation remains limited. This study presents the detailed evaluation of AOC in the megacity of Beijing based on newly developed indexes that represent the estimated oxidative capacity from the prospective of oxidation products (AOIe) and the potential oxidative capacity considering the oxidation rates of major reactants by oxidants (AOIp). A comprehensive suite of data taken from summer and winter field campaigns were used to create these two indexes and in the calculation of AOC. The AOC showed a clear seasonal pattern, with stronger intensity in summer compared to winter. The gaseous-phase oxidation products (O3 and NO2) dominated AOIe (~80%) during summertime at both sites, while the contribution of particle-phase oxidation products (sulfate, nitrate, and secondary organic aerosol) to AOIe increased in winter (~30%). As for AOIp in summer, the dominant contributor was alkenes (31.0%, urban) and CO (38.5%, suburban), whereas CO and NO2 dominated AOIp at both urban (68.8%) and suburban (61.0%) sites during wintertime. As expected, the dominant oxidant contributor to AOIp during the daytime was OH, while O3 was the second most important oxidant at both sites. The diurnal variations of normalized AOIe and AOIp were examined, revealing that they share the same daytime peak but showed significant bias during the nighttime. To explore the possible deviation in sources between AOIe and AOIp, a constrained photochemical box model and a constrained multiphase chemical box model were used to evaluate AOC budgets and their source apportionment. Our results suggest that unmeasured OVOC (oxygenated volatile organic compound) species and missed heterogeneous oxidation processes in the calculation of AOIp contributed substantially to the underestimation of AOC by this index, which should be taken into consideration in future studies of AOC.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145306

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145306;
PII
S0048969721003739;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Science of the Total Environment
Journal Volume
771
Journal Page Range
vp.
ISSN
0048-9697
CODEN
STENDL

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.