Deep learning approach to predict pain progression in knee osteoarthritis
Creators
- 1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States)
- 2. Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, 1111 Highland Avenue, 53705-2275, Madison, WI (United States)
- 3. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA (United States)
- 4. Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (United States)
- 5. Department of Radiology, Boston University, Boston, MA (United States)
- 6. Department of Radiology, New York University, New York, NY (United States)
Description
To develop and evaluate deep learning (DL) risk assessment models for predicting pain progression in subjects with or at risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The incidence and progression cohorts of the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a multi-center longitudinal study involving 9348 knees in 4674 subjects with or at risk of knee OA that began in 2004 and is ongoing, were used to conduct this retrospective analysis. A subset of knees without and with pain progression (defined as a 9-point or greater increase in pain score between baseline and two or more follow-up time points over the first 48 months) was randomly stratified into training (4200 knees with a mean age of 61.0 years and 60% female) and hold-out testing (500 knees with a mean age of 60.8 years and 60% female) datasets. A DL model was developed to predict pain progression using baseline knee radiographs. An artificial neural network was used to develop a traditional risk assessment model to predict pain progression using demographic, clinical, and radiographic risk factors. A combined model was developed to combine demographic, clinical, and radiographic risk factors with DL analysis of baseline knee radiographs. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was performed using the hold-out testing dataset to evaluate model performance. The traditional model had an AUC of 0.692 (66.9% sensitivity and 64.1% specificity). The DL model had an AUC of 0.770 (76.7% sensitivity and 70.5% specificity), which was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the traditional model. The combined model had an AUC of 0.807 (72.3% sensitivity and 80.9% specificity), which was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the traditional and DL models. DL models using baseline knee radiographs had higher diagnostic performance for predicting pain progression than traditional models using demographic, clinical, and radiographic risk factors.
Availability note (English)
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03773-0Additional details
Identifiers
Publishing Information
- Journal Title
- Skeletal Radiology
- Journal Volume
- 51
- Journal Issue
- 2
- Journal Page Range
- p. 363-373
- ISSN
- 0364-2348
- CODEN
- SKRADI
INIS
- Country of Publication
- Germany
- Country of Input or Organization
- Germany
- INIS RN
- 53032872
- Subject category
- S62: RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
- Resource subtype / Literary indicator
- Numerical Data
- Descriptors DEI
- BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY; BONE JOINTS; COMPILED DATA; DATASETS; DIAGNOSIS; ELDERLY PEOPLE; FEMUR; IMAGE PROCESSING; MACHINE LEARNING; NEURAL NETWORKS; PAIN; PERFORMANCE; RHEUMATIC DISEASES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY; SPECIFICITY; TIBIA; TRAINING
- Descriptors DEC
- ADULTS; AGE GROUPS; AGED ADULTS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BODY; DATA; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; DISEASES; DOCUMENT TYPES; EDUCATION; HUMAN POPULATIONS; HUMANS; INFORMATION; LEARNING; MAMMALS; MATHEMATICAL LOGIC; MEDICINE; MINORITY GROUPS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; NUMERICAL DATA; ORGANS; POPULATIONS; PRIMATES; PROCESSING; RADIOLOGY; SKELETON; SYMPTOMS; VERTEBRATES