Published September 2018 | Version v1
Journal article

Comparative study of reduced order equivalent circuit models for on-board state-of-available-power prediction of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles

  • 1. Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, JARA-Energy, Jaegerstr. 17-19, D-52066 Aachen (Germany)
  • 2. Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage Systems Group, Institute for Power Electronics and Electrical Drives (ISEA), RWTH Aachen University (Germany)
  • 3. Institute for Power Generation and Storage Systems (PGS), E.ON ERC, RWTH Aachen University (Germany)

Description

Highlights: • Seven impedance-based ECMs are investigated in MiL environment. • The model using 3 ZARC-elements indicates highest impedance determination accuracy. • VRMS increases by a factor of 5 with decreasing temperature from 40 °C to 0 °C. • Error in power doubled when prediction time horizon increases from 10 s to 20 s. Battery management systems (BMS) are responsible for the reliable and safe operation of lithium-ion battery packs in electric vehicles (EVs). State-of-Charge (SoC), State-of-Health (SoH) and State-of-Available-Power (SoAP) are the major battery states that must be determined by means of so-called monitoring algorithms. In this study, a comparative study of a wide range of impedance-based equivalent circuit models (ECMs) for on-board SoAP prediction is carried out. In total, seven dynamic ECMs including ohmic resistance, RC-elements, ZARC-elements connected in series with a voltage source are implemented. The investigated ECMs are verified under varying conditions (different temperatures and wide SoC range) in a model-in-the-loop (MiL) environment using real vehicle data obtained in an EV prototype and current pulse tests. In this context, LIBs at different aging states using various active materials (NMC/C, NMC/LTO, LFP/C) are investigated. Furthermore, the current dependence of the charge transfer resistance is considered by applying the Butler-Volmer equation. The dependence of voltage estimation and SoAP prediction accuracy for different prediction time horizons on SoC, temperature and applied current rate is examined comprehensively.

Availability note (English)

Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.066

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.066;
PII
S0306261918307761;

Publishing Information

Journal Title
Applied Energy
Journal Volume
225
Journal Page Range
p. 1102-1122
ISSN
0306-2619
CODEN
APENDX

Optional Information

Copyright
Copyright (c) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.